Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Jun 21, 2020. It is now read-only.

Conversation

@depfu
Copy link
Contributor

@depfu depfu bot commented May 28, 2019

Here is everything you need to know about this update. Please take a good look at what changed and the test results before merging this pull request.

What changed?

✳️ babel-cli (6.24.1 → 6.26.0) · Repo · Changelog

Release Notes

6.26.0

6.26.0 (2017-08-16)

Backports for some folks (also others when we accidentally merged PRs from both 6.x/master)
Lesson learned: just use master and backport on another branch.
7.x beta is next: https://github.com/babel/babel/milestone/9, not planning on further 6.x releases (we say this every time)

👓 Spec Compliancy

  • babel-core, babel-generator, babel-plugin-transform-flow-comments, babel-plugin-transform-flow-strip-types, babel-traverse, babel-types

🚀 New Feature

  • babel-cli
    • #5796 Allow --inspect-brk option to be used with babel-node [6.x backport]. (@noinkling)

🐛 Bug Fix

📝 Documentation

  • babel-plugin-transform-class-properties
  • babel-plugin-transform-runtime
  • babel-plugin-transform-regenerator
    • #5852 Fix babel-plugin-transform-regenerator README. (@k15a)
  • Other
  • babel-generator, babel-plugin-transform-es2015-arrow-functions, babel-plugin-transform-es2015-modules-commonjs, babel-plugin-transform-es2015-spread, babel-plugin-transform-runtime, babel-register

🏠 Internal

  • babel-traverse
    • #5965 Remove unused functions from renamer.js.. (@mcav)
    • #5363 Increase the code coverage for traverse evaluation. (@ssuman)
  • Other

Committers: 19

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 48 commits:

✳️ babel-register (6.24.1 → 6.26.0) · Repo · Changelog

Release Notes

6.26.0

6.26.0 (2017-08-16)

Backports for some folks (also others when we accidentally merged PRs from both 6.x/master)
Lesson learned: just use master and backport on another branch.
7.x beta is next: https://github.com/babel/babel/milestone/9, not planning on further 6.x releases (we say this every time)

👓 Spec Compliancy

  • babel-core, babel-generator, babel-plugin-transform-flow-comments, babel-plugin-transform-flow-strip-types, babel-traverse, babel-types

🚀 New Feature

  • babel-cli
    • #5796 Allow --inspect-brk option to be used with babel-node [6.x backport]. (@noinkling)

🐛 Bug Fix

📝 Documentation

  • babel-plugin-transform-class-properties
  • babel-plugin-transform-runtime
  • babel-plugin-transform-regenerator
    • #5852 Fix babel-plugin-transform-regenerator README. (@k15a)
  • Other
  • babel-generator, babel-plugin-transform-es2015-arrow-functions, babel-plugin-transform-es2015-modules-commonjs, babel-plugin-transform-es2015-spread, babel-plugin-transform-runtime, babel-register

🏠 Internal

  • babel-traverse
    • #5965 Remove unused functions from renamer.js.. (@mcav)
    • #5363 Increase the code coverage for traverse evaluation. (@ssuman)
  • Other

Committers: 19

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 48 commits:


Depfu Status

Depfu will automatically keep this PR conflict-free, as long as you don't add any commits to this branch yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting with @depfu rebase.

All Depfu comment commands
@​depfu rebase
Rebases against your default branch and redoes this update
@​depfu merge
Merges this PR once your tests are passing and conflicts are resolved
@​depfu close
Closes this PR and deletes the branch
@​depfu reopen
Restores the branch and reopens this PR (if it's closed)
@​depfu pause
Ignores all future updates for this dependency and closes this PR
@​depfu pause [minor|major]
Ignores all future minor/major updates for this dependency and closes this PR
@​depfu resume
Future versions of this dependency will create PRs again (leaves this PR as is)

@depfu depfu bot added the depfu label May 28, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants