NETOBSERV-2455 bump ebpf dep#1135
Conversation
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
go.mod
Outdated
|
|
||
| replace github.com/vmware/go-ipfix => github.com/jotak/go-ipfix v0.0.0-20250708115123-407c539ea101 | ||
|
|
||
| replace github.com/netobserv/netobserv-ebpf-agent => ../netobserv-ebpf-agent |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Will need to replace this when merged ☝️
|
New image: It will expire after two weeks. To deploy this build, run from the operator repo, assuming the operator is running: USER=netobserv VERSION=ec3e423 make set-flp-image |
|
@jpinsonneau - are we good to run the perf test here to measure impact on FLP with the local ebpf package here? |
|
/test flp-node-density-heavy-25nodes |
Don't we need all images at once for that ? 🤔 |
In this case, I think yes, since there's a dependency with ebpf-agent. Let see what perf run come back with. |
|
/label qe-approved |
57a697c to
fb62aba
Compare
|
@jpinsonneau: The following tests failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
fb62aba to
2087208
Compare
Description
Bump eBPF deps for DNS Name
Dependencies
netobserv/netobserv-ebpf-agent#820
Checklist
If you are not familiar with our processes or don't know what to answer in the list below, let us know in a comment: the maintainers will take care of that.
To run a perfscale test, comment with:
/test flp-node-density-heavy-25nodes