Skip to content

Fix NetworkEvents with upstream ovnk#2461

Merged
jotak merged 2 commits intonetobserv:mainfrom
jotak:netevents-upstream
Feb 18, 2026
Merged

Fix NetworkEvents with upstream ovnk#2461
jotak merged 2 commits intonetobserv:mainfrom
jotak:netevents-upstream

Conversation

@jotak
Copy link
Member

@jotak jotak commented Feb 17, 2026

Description

When deploying upstream ovnk (on kind), /var/run/ovn-ic does not exist on host. The required sock can be found in /var/run/openvswitch.

This fix introduces a Openshift/Non-Openshift condition, and also adds the env OVN_OBSERV_HOST_MOUNT_PATH so that the host path can be overridden if necessary (as a last resort fallback; ideally, all use cases should be wired in code)

Dependencies

n/a

Checklist

If you are not familiar with our processes or don't know what to answer in the list below, let us know in a comment: the maintainers will take care of that.

  • Is this PR backed with a JIRA ticket? If so, make sure it is written as a title prefix (in general, PRs affecting the NetObserv/Network Observability product should be backed with a JIRA ticket - especially if they bring user facing changes).
  • Does this PR require product documentation?
    • If so, make sure the JIRA epic is labeled with "documentation" and provides a description relevant for doc writers, such as use cases or scenarios. Any required step to activate or configure the feature should be documented there, such as new CRD knobs.
  • Does this PR require a product release notes entry?
    • If so, fill in "Release Note Text" in the JIRA.
  • Is there anything else the QE team should know before testing? E.g: configuration changes, environment setup, etc.
    • If so, make sure it is described in the JIRA ticket.
  • QE requirements (check 1 from the list):
    • Standard QE validation, with pre-merge tests unless stated otherwise.
    • Regression tests only (e.g. refactoring with no user-facing change).
    • No QE (e.g. trivial change with high reviewer's confidence, or per agreement with the QE team).

@jotak jotak requested a review from msherif1234 February 17, 2026 10:37
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 17, 2026

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign stleerh for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@jotak jotak requested a review from OlivierCazade February 17, 2026 10:51
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 17, 2026

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 88.88889% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 72.53%. Comparing base (7add574) to head (c4abb6a).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
internal/controller/ebpf/agent_controller.go 88.88% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2461      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   72.21%   72.53%   +0.32%     
==========================================
  Files         104      104              
  Lines       10624    10629       +5     
==========================================
+ Hits         7672     7710      +38     
+ Misses       2477     2444      -33     
  Partials      475      475              
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 72.53% <88.88%> (+0.32%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
internal/controller/ebpf/agent_controller.go 67.83% <88.88%> (+7.20%) ⬆️

... and 2 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@jotak jotak force-pushed the netevents-upstream branch from b645afd to c4abb6a Compare February 17, 2026 13:07
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 17, 2026

@jotak: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/ci-bundle-noo-bundle c4abb6a link true /test ci-bundle-noo-bundle

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Copy link
Member

@OlivierCazade OlivierCazade left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm label Feb 18, 2026
@jotak jotak merged commit 483f0c4 into netobserv:main Feb 18, 2026
11 of 13 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants