-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
Fix: Facilitator should validate user balance before sending settlement transaction #199
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Deploying x402-exec with
|
| Latest commit: |
ffcfa6b
|
| Status: | ✅ Deploy successful! |
| Preview URL: | https://b1c720ba.x402-exec.pages.dev |
| Branch Preview URL: | https://holon-fix-196-20260105-06282.x402-exec.pages.dev |
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Pull request overview
This PR implements balance validation before sending settlement transactions to prevent wasting gas on transactions that would fail due to insufficient user balance, addressing issue #196.
Key Changes:
- Added ERC20 balance check in
executeSettlementWithRouterbefore transaction submission - Introduced optional
publicClientparameter for balance validation with backward compatibility - Implemented graceful error handling for RPC failures during balance checks
Reviewed changes
Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 3 comments.
| File | Description |
|---|---|
typescript/packages/facilitator-sdk/src/settlement.ts |
Added ERC20_ABI constant, balance validation logic with optional publicClient parameter, and updated callers to pass publicClient |
typescript/packages/facilitator-sdk/test/settlement.test.ts |
Added 4 comprehensive test cases covering sufficient balance, insufficient balance, optional publicClient behavior, and RPC error handling |
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
| } catch (error) { | ||
| // If balance check fails, log the error but continue with transaction | ||
| // The transaction will fail on-chain with a more specific error if balance is truly insufficient | ||
| if (error instanceof Error && !error.message.includes("Insufficient balance")) { | ||
| console.warn("[executeSettlementWithRouter] Balance check failed, proceeding with transaction:", error.message); | ||
| } else { | ||
| // Re-throw the insufficient balance error | ||
| throw error; | ||
| } |
Copilot
AI
Jan 5, 2026
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The error handling logic relies on string matching to distinguish between RPC errors and insufficient balance errors. This approach is fragile. Consider using a custom error class for insufficient balance errors (e.g., InsufficientBalanceError extends Error) and checking the error type with instanceof instead of checking if the message includes a specific string. This would be more maintainable and less prone to breaking if error messages change.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
✅ FIXED: Good catch! I've implemented a custom InsufficientBalanceError class that extends Error with structured fields (balance, required, payment, fee). The error handling now uses instanceof InsufficientBalanceError checks instead of fragile string matching. This approach is more maintainable, type-safe, and won't break if error messages change in the future.
Action taken: Added InsufficientBalanceError class to settlement.ts with readonly fields for balance, required, payment, and fee amounts. Updated error handling to use instanceof checks instead of string matching.
| executeSettlementWithRouter(mockWalletClient, params, { | ||
| publicClient: mockPublicClient, | ||
| }), | ||
| ).rejects.toThrow(`Insufficient balance: user has ${insufficientBalance} tokens, but needs ${requiredAmount}`); |
Copilot
AI
Jan 5, 2026
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The test assertion for the error message is incomplete. The actual error message includes additional details about the payment breakdown. The expected error message should match the full format from the implementation which includes: "(payment: ${params.value} + facilitator fee: ${params.facilitatorFee})". Consider using a more flexible assertion like toThrow(/Insufficient balance:/) or include the complete error message.
| ).rejects.toThrow(`Insufficient balance: user has ${insufficientBalance} tokens, but needs ${requiredAmount}`); | |
| ).rejects.toThrow(/Insufficient balance:/); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
✅ FIXED: You're absolutely right! I've updated the test assertion to use toThrow(InsufficientBalanceError) instead of string matching. This provides more robust type-based assertion that will correctly identify the error regardless of message format changes, and is more aligned with the custom error class implementation.
Action taken: Updated test assertion from string matching to type-based check using toThrow(InsufficientBalanceError). Added InsufficientBalanceError to test imports.
| ] as const; | ||
|
|
||
| /** | ||
| * Execute settlement via SettlementRouter |
Copilot
AI
Jan 5, 2026
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The JSDoc comment for this function is incomplete. It should document all parameters including the newly added publicClient parameter in the config object. Consider adding @param tags for walletClient, params, and config (with details about its properties including the new publicClient field), as well as a @returns tag, following the pattern used in other functions in this file.
| * Execute settlement via SettlementRouter | |
| * Execute settlement via SettlementRouter. | |
| * | |
| * @param walletClient - The viem {@link WalletClient} used to send the settlement transaction. | |
| * @param params - The {@link SettlementRouterParams} describing the settlement to execute. | |
| * @param config - Optional configuration overrides. | |
| * @param config.gasLimit - Explicit gas limit to use for the transaction. If omitted, it is derived | |
| * from {@link calculateGasLimit} based on the facilitator fee and `gasMultiplier`. | |
| * @param config.gasMultiplier - Multiplier applied when estimating gas usage (for safety margin). | |
| * @param config.publicClient - Optional viem {@link PublicClient} to use for read operations | |
| * (for example, gas estimation or chain state queries). If not provided, a client may be created | |
| * internally as needed. | |
| * @returns A promise that resolves to the transaction hash of the settlement as a hex string. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
✅ FIXED: Thank you for the thorough review! I've added comprehensive JSDoc documentation for executeSettlementWithRouter including all parameters with @param tags (walletClient, params, config), detailed descriptions of each config property (gasLimit, gasMultiplier, publicClient), @returns tag documenting the return value, and @throws tags for both InsufficientBalanceError and generic Error conditions. The documentation now follows the same pattern used for other functions in the file.
Action taken: Enhanced JSDoc comment for executeSettlementWithRouter function with complete parameter documentation, return value, and exception documentation.
|
@holonbot |
PR #199 Review Comment Fixes - SummaryAll review comments from PR #199 have been successfully addressed. This PR implements balance validation for the facilitator to prevent wasting gas on transactions with insufficient user balance. Changes Made1. Custom Error Class (Comment #2660790861)Issue: Error handling relied on fragile string matching to distinguish between RPC errors and insufficient balance errors. Fix: Created a custom
Files Modified:
2. Test Assertion Update (Comment #2660790874)Issue: Test assertion used incomplete string matching that didn't account for the full error message format. Fix: Updated test to use the custom error class with
Files Modified:
3. Complete JSDoc Documentation (Comment #2660790885)Issue: The Fix: Added comprehensive JSDoc documentation including:
Files Modified:
VerificationBuild Status✅ All TypeScript packages built successfully: Test Results✅ All 93 tests passed (92 passed, 1 skipped): Specifically verified:
Code Quality
Review ResponsesComment #2660790861 (Custom Error Class)Status: ✅ Fixed Comment #2660790874 (Test Assertion)Status: ✅ Fixed Comment #2660790885 (JSDoc Documentation)Status: ✅ Fixed ConclusionAll three review comments have been successfully addressed:
The implementation maintains backward compatibility, improves code maintainability, and follows TypeScript best practices. All tests pass successfully. |
|
Holon completed successfully. Run: https://github.com/nuwa-protocol/x402-exec/actions/runs/20716159049 |
Fixes #196
Summary: Facilitator Balance Validation Implementation
Issue
GitHub Issue #196: Facilitator should validate user balance before sending settlement transaction
Problem
The facilitator was sending settlement transactions without validating the user's token balance first, resulting in failed transactions that wasted gas when users had insufficient balance.
Example Scenario (from issue)
ERC20: transfer amount exceeds balanceSolution Implemented
Code Changes
1.
typescript/packages/facilitator-sdk/src/settlement.tsexecuteSettlementWithRouterfunction:publicClientparameter to configexecuteSettlementWithWalletClient: now passespublicClientsettleWithSettlementRouter: now passespublicClient2.
typescript/packages/facilitator-sdk/test/settlement.test.tsAdded 4 new test cases:
"should validate user balance before sending transaction when publicClient is provided"
"should throw error when user has insufficient balance"
"should skip balance check when publicClient is not provided"
"should handle balance check errors gracefully and proceed with transaction"
Key Design Decisions
requiredAmount = paymentAmount + facilitatorFeeVerification
Test Results
All existing tests pass, plus 4 new tests for balance validation.
Files Modified
typescript/packages/facilitator-sdk/src/settlement.ts: +45 linestypescript/packages/facilitator-sdk/test/settlement.test.ts: +131 linesBenefits
Acceptance Criteria (from issue)