[sbus] Fix bridge, lux & motion sensors

[cipianpascu]

No description provided.

[lsiepel]

Please divide a proper description

[cipianpascu]

Please divide a proper description

hey @lsiepel , not sure what you are looking for but let me give it a try:

1. the timeout property that I introduced with my previous PR broke the bridge. Now it should work again.
2. After a bit of thinking, I decided to group the motion, lux (and contact) into one thing. It is better for the long run.

[lsiepel]

The start post is empty. I was looking for a description about this PR. What enhancement or bug does it fix. Was it tested by you or others, links to background information. Anything that can be helpful for either users that come here from the release notes or maintainers who review the PR

[Copilot]

Pull Request Overview

This PR fixes and consolidates the sensor handling in the SBUS binding by replacing separate motion and lux sensor device types with a unified multi-sensor approach for 9-in-1 devices.

• Replaces individual motion-sensor and lux-sensor thing types with a unified multi-sensor type
• Improves error handling across handlers by adding null-safe error messages
• Adds proper status updates when async messages are processed

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 13 out of 13 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

Show a summary per file

File	Description
thing-types.xml	Consolidates motion and lux sensor types into unified multi-sensor type
SbusHandlerFactory.java	Updates factory to create new Sbus9in1SensorsHandler for multi-sensor devices
BindingConstants.java	Removes separate sensor constants and adds unified multi-sensor constant
Sbus9in1SensorsHandler.java	New coordinator handler for 9-in-1 devices that routes messages to specialized handlers
Sbus9in1ContactHandler.java	New specialized contact handler for 9-in-1 devices
Multiple handler files	Adds null-safe error messages and status updates for async message processing
pom.xml	Updates j2sbus dependency to version 1.6.4
README.md	Updates documentation to reflect new multi-sensor approach

---

_{Tip: Customize your code reviews with copilot-instructions.md. Create the file or learn how to get started.}

[cipianpascu]

This PR is ready to be merged. Please review it.

[lsiepel]

Thanks for this contribution. This is a partial review mainly for the readme. Will continue later on. The readme should be focused on the openHAB model. For instance the channel sections talk about traditional and other sensors. It would be better to stick to the thing type contact-sensor Similar remarks in the same file.

Another question, this does seem to be a breaking change. As existing things are removed, an upgrade notice should be created.

[lsiepel]

just two minor comments, otherwise LGTM

[cipianpascu]

just two minor comments, otherwise LGTM

thank you.

[lsiepel]

Thanks, LGTM