Rel Notes 4.21 Storage#104646
Merged
lpettyjo merged 1 commit intoopenshift:enterprise-4.21from Jan 28, 2026
Merged
Conversation
openshift-ci
bot
added
the
size/L
Contributor
Author
|
/retest |
|
🤖 Mon Jan 26 15:25:24 - Prow CI generated the docs preview: |
lpettyjo
force-pushed
the
rel_notes_4_21
branch
from
35e0e9c to
77fbbc3
Compare
Phaow
reviewed
Jan 14, 2026
lpettyjo
force-pushed
the
rel_notes_4_21
branch
from
77fbbc3 to
95f74cf
Compare
gcharot
reviewed
Jan 15, 2026
gcharot
reviewed
Jan 15, 2026
gcharot
reviewed
Jan 15, 2026
lpettyjo
force-pushed
the
rel_notes_4_21
branch
from
95f74cf to
c8390a0
Compare
duanwei33
reviewed
Jan 20, 2026
dfajmon
approved these changes
Jan 20, 2026
dfajmon
left a comment
dfajmon
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM
regarding Volume Attributes Classes
lpettyjo
force-pushed
the
rel_notes_4_21
branch
from
c8390a0 to
a3322d0
Compare
Phaow
reviewed
Jan 21, 2026
duanwei33
reviewed
Jan 21, 2026
chao007
reviewed
Jan 21, 2026
gcharot
reviewed
Jan 21, 2026
radeore
reviewed
Jan 21, 2026
radeore
reviewed
Jan 21, 2026
radeore
reviewed
Jan 21, 2026
lpettyjo
force-pushed
the
rel_notes_4_21
branch
from
a3322d0 to
b233928
Compare
Contributor
|
lgtm overall |
gcharot
reviewed
Jan 22, 2026
gcharot
reviewed
Jan 22, 2026
lpettyjo
force-pushed
the
rel_notes_4_21
branch
2 times, most recently
from
560f7ed to
5668964
Compare
|
LGTM |
|
LGTM |
lpettyjo
force-pushed
the
rel_notes_4_21
branch
from
5668964 to
27d9518
Compare
Member
|
LGTM |
1 similar comment
|
LGTM |
lpettyjo
force-pushed
the
rel_notes_4_21
branch
from
27d9518 to
80fa416
Compare
|
@lpettyjo: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
Member
|
lgtm |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
12 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Version(s): 4.21 only
Issue:
Link to docs preview:
Features: https://104646--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/release_notes/ocp-4-21-release-notes.html#ocp-release-notes-storage_release-notes
Deprecate/Removed Features: https://104646--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/release_notes/ocp-4-21-release-notes.html#storage-deprecated-and-removed-features
TP/GA feature status table: https://104646--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/release_notes/ocp-4-21-release-notes.html#ocp-release-notes-storage-tech-preview_release-notes
QE review:
Additional information:
PTAL: @dobsonj @jsafrane @gnufied @dfajmon @RomanBednar @Phaow @duanwei33 @chao007 @radeore @gcharot