Skip to content

Conversation

@neisw
Copy link
Contributor

@neisw neisw commented Feb 2, 2026

No description provided.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

Pipeline controller notification
This repo is configured to use the pipeline controller. Second-stage tests will be triggered either automatically or after lgtm label is added, depending on the repository configuration. The pipeline controller will automatically detect which contexts are required and will utilize /test Prow commands to trigger the second stage.

For optional jobs, comment /test ? to see a list of all defined jobs. To trigger manually all jobs from second stage use /pipeline required command.

This repository is configured in: automatic mode

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Feb 2, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@neisw: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-74917, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.22.0" version, but no target version was set

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Feb 2, 2026
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from deads2k and p0lyn0mial February 2, 2026 19:54
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

Scheduling required tests:
/test e2e-aws-csi
/test e2e-aws-ovn-fips
/test e2e-aws-ovn-microshift
/test e2e-aws-ovn-microshift-serial
/test e2e-aws-ovn-serial-1of2
/test e2e-aws-ovn-serial-2of2
/test e2e-gcp-csi
/test e2e-gcp-ovn
/test e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade
/test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6
/test e2e-vsphere-ovn
/test e2e-vsphere-ovn-upi

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 3, 2026

@neisw: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@dgoodwin
Copy link
Contributor

dgoodwin commented Feb 3, 2026

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 3, 2026
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 3, 2026

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: dgoodwin, neisw

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@dgoodwin
Copy link
Contributor

dgoodwin commented Feb 3, 2026

Actually I think I'll hold, I rage reworked this last night, I hope it's ready to review today.

/hold

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Feb 3, 2026
@tmshort
Copy link
Contributor

tmshort commented Feb 3, 2026

operator-marketplace now watches the apiserver.config.openshift.io/cluster resource for TLS profile support. This increase was expected.

@jianzhangbjz
Copy link
Member

/verified by @jianzhangbjz

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria label Feb 4, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@jianzhangbjz: This PR has been marked as verified by @jianzhangbjz.

Details

In response to this:

/verified by @jianzhangbjz

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@jianzhangbjz
Copy link
Member

Based on the https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/test-platform-results/pr-logs/pull/openshift_operator-framework-olm/1217/pull-ci-openshift-operator-framework-olm-main-e2e-gcp-ovn/2018519832512696320 logs,

[Monitor:audit-log-analyzer][sig-arch][Late] operators should not create watch channels very often expand_less0s{Operator "marketplace-operator" produces more watch requests than expected: watchrequestcount=39, upperbound=38, ratio=1.03  } | : [Monitor:audit-log-analyzer][sig-arch][Late] operators should not create watch channels very often expand_less | 0s | {Operator "marketplace-operator" produces more watch requests than expected: watchrequestcount=39, upperbound=38, ratio=1.03  }

Starting EventSource controller=catalogsource-controller source="kind source: *v1alpha1.CatalogSource"                                                                  
Starting EventSource controller=operatorhub-controller source="kind source: *v1.OperatorHub"                                                                            
Starting EventSource controller=configmap-controller source="kind source: *v1.ConfigMap"
...
OpenShift APIServer API available - setting up watch for APIServer TLS configuration                                                                                    
APIServer TLS configuration changed: profile=Intermediate (default), minVersion=TLS 1.2, cipherCount=9 

Watch resources:

  • CatalogSource
  • OperatorHub
  • ConfigMap
  • APIServer (New)

39 < 2*30 (https://github.com/openshift/origin/blob/main/pkg/monitortests/kubeapiserver/auditloganalyzer/handle_operator_watch_count_tracking.go#L464-L466). LGTM.

@jianzhangbjz
Copy link
Member

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Feb 4, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@jianzhangbjz: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-74917, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.22.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.22.0)
  • bug is in the state ASSIGNED, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Jira (jiazha@redhat.com), skipping review request.

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants