-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 65
Daemonset install without reboot #1349
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Draft
Pacho20
wants to merge
4
commits into
openshift:devel
Choose a base branch
from
Pacho20:daemonset-install-without-reboot
base: devel
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Draft
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
b4fc5c5
daemonset deployment: prevent installation if NODE_LABEL envar is unset
Pacho20 7474625
daemonset deployment: migrate peer-pods config handling to osc-rpm Da…
Pacho20 47d28ac
daemonset deployment: enable Kata installation without node reboots
Pacho20 9c19cf2
logic to backup etc before uninstall
Pacho20 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Some comments aren't visible on the classic Files Changed page.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What is the point of
:-here?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The
-uoption is set, so if the variable is unset, it results in an error. Therefore, we don’t necessarily need:-, but using it allows us to set the variable to an empty string and thereby control the error message.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I meant: You are adding a test to check if
NODE_LABELis not set, with an error message that essentially is a almost exactly whatbashitself would give you.I see no functional difference between
and
So that code segment seems pointless to me.
Alternative: make the error message better, and send it to stderr instead of stdout.