feat: update edge management examples to reflect current state of the…#658
Open
nenkoru wants to merge 1 commit intoopenziti:mainfrom
Open
feat: update edge management examples to reflect current state of the…#658nenkoru wants to merge 1 commit intoopenziti:mainfrom
nenkoru wants to merge 1 commit intoopenziti:mainfrom
Conversation
plorenz
reviewed
Feb 18, 2025
| @@ -324,7 +331,7 @@ credentials.CaPool = caPool | |||
|
|
|||
| //Note: the CA pool can be provided here or during the Authenticate(<creds>) call. It is allowed here to enable | |||
| // calls to REST API endpoints that do not require authentication. | |||
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This should also take the totpCallback, or nil.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
While working with the sdk I found out that the current way to instantiate an Edge Management API client differs from the one in the example.
Hence the proposed changes.