Skip to content

Conversation

@auguste-probabl
Copy link
Collaborator

This contributes to #2153

When used in the context of joblib.Parallel with n_jobs != 1 we still have to keep the saving logic in the caller because joblib parallelism is process-wise, not thread-wise.

@auguste-probabl auguste-probabl linked an issue Nov 20, 2025 that may be closed by this pull request
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Documentation preview @ e84e81a

@thomass-dev
Copy link
Collaborator

Should the branch be deleted @auguste-probabl ?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Make cache thread-safe

2 participants