Skip to content

This project involved analyzing Bank’s credit card portfolio (~18 million active cards) to evaluate the profitability and performance of various card variants across different customer profiles. The analysis helped in optimizing sourcing strategy by identifying underperforming segments and tailoring card offerings to high-value customer bands.

Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings

ramanbansal9876/Credit-Card-Segmentation-and-Profitability-Analysis

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 

History

7 Commits
 
 

Repository files navigation

📊 Credit Card Segmentation & Profitability Analysis using SQL and Excel – (Internal)

🔍 Overview

This project involved analyzing Bank’s credit card portfolio (~18 million active cards) to evaluate the profitability and performance of various card variants across different customer profiles. The analysis helped in optimizing sourcing strategy by identifying underperforming segments and tailoring card offerings to high-value customer bands.

🧩 Business Objective

  • Determine the profitability of credit card variants at a granular customer level.
  • Identify which customer segments are associated with profitable or delinquent behavior.
  • Guide targeted sourcing, risk mitigation, and portfolio optimization efforts.

🧰 Tools & Technologies

  • SQL – For large-scale data extraction, joins, and aggregations from internal banking systems.
  • Microsoft Excel – For customer segmentation, trend analysis, and profitability banding.
  • PowerPoint – To present insights and strategy recommendations to senior stakeholders.

🧾 Dataset Details

  • Source: Internal Bank credit card portfolio
  • Size: ~1.8 crore (18 million) active credit cards
  • Key Variables:
    • Accounts Count, UCICs Count (Customer Count), PBT per UCIC
    • Onus ENR, Offus ENR per UCIC
    • L3M (Last 3 Months) spending per customer across:
      • Credit Card
      • Debit Card
      • UPI
    • Organic vs Inorganic balances
    • DPD (Delinquency – Days Past Due)

🔎 Analysis Approach

1. Data Preparation

  • Extracted 18M+ records using SQL.
  • Merged datasets at the customer level (UCIC).
  • Derived per-customer metrics and calculated profitability using PBT per UCIC.

2. Variant-Wise Performance Evaluation

  • Measured spend behavior, balance distribution, and delinquency trends across card types.
  • Flagged underperforming variants with low profitability or high risk (DPD).

3. Customer Banding and Segmentation

To go beyond just product-level trends, customer behavior was analyzed across multiple profile bands:

Banding Attribute Description
Bureau Score (CIBIL) Grouped customers by creditworthiness to detect risk-prone card segments.
NTB/ETB Tag Split new vs existing customers to understand lifecycle profitability.
IRV Categories Used internal risk-value (IRV) classification for ETB customers based on PBT bands.
Age Group Analyzed young vs older customer trends across card types.
Profession Segmented by salaried, self-employed, others, to see PBT and delinquency differences.
Monthly Income Income-wise profitability mapping to align products with affordability.
Location Tiering Compared customer profiles across metro, tier-1, tier-2, and tier-3 cities.

This helped uncover intersectional insights, such as:

  • Some card variants performing well in metros but poorly in tier-2 towns.
  • NTB customers with low CIBIL scores driving negative PBT on specific variants.

4. Insight Presentation

  • Developed a slide deck summarizing:
    • Card-wise profitability patterns
    • Customer segment trends
    • Strategic recommendations for sourcing and risk teams

📈 Outcome & Business Impact

  • Sourcing Strategy Updated
    Several card variants saw targeting adjustments based on profitability by customer segment.

  • Risk Strategy Informed
    Risk teams used delinquency insights to define tighter eligibility criteria for high-risk segments.

  • Portfolio Profitability Improved
    Card offerings became more aligned with customer potential, boosting the overall efficiency of the credit card portfolio.

📌 Key Learnings

  • Even without ML, a structured approach to segment-wise profitability can drive high-impact business outcomes.
  • Multi-band segmentation using behavioral, demographic, and credit attributes is key to understanding customer-level performance.
  • Translating raw analytics into simple, visual presentations helps decision-makers act with confidence.

About

This project involved analyzing Bank’s credit card portfolio (~18 million active cards) to evaluate the profitability and performance of various card variants across different customer profiles. The analysis helped in optimizing sourcing strategy by identifying underperforming segments and tailoring card offerings to high-value customer bands.

Topics

Resources

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

No packages published