chore(site): weekly changelog

[NicholasKissel]

Description

Please include a summary of the changes and the related issue. Please also include relevant motivation and context.

Type of change

• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
• This change requires a documentation update

How Has This Been Tested?

Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes.

Checklist:

• My code follows the style guidelines of this project
• I have performed a self-review of my code
• I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
• I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
• My changes generate no new warnings
• I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
• New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes

[NicholasKissel]

• chore(site): weekly changelog #4152 👈 (View in Graphite)
• main

---

How to use the Graphite Merge Queue

Add the label merge-queue to this PR to add it to the merge queue.

You must have a Graphite account in order to use the merge queue. Sign up using this link.

An organization admin has enabled the Graphite Merge Queue in this repository.

Please do not merge from GitHub as this will restart CI on PRs being processed by the merge queue.

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

[railway-app]

🚅 Deployed to the rivet-pr-4152 environment in rivet-frontend

Service	Status	Web	Updated (UTC)
website	❌ Build Failed (View Logs)	Web	Feb 6, 2026 at 11:22 pm
mcp-hub	✅ Success (View Logs)	Web	Feb 6, 2026 at 11:20 pm
frontend-inspector	❌ Build Failed (View Logs)	Web	Feb 6, 2026 at 11:20 pm
frontend-cloud	❌ Build Failed (View Logs)	Web	Feb 6, 2026 at 11:20 pm

[claude]

PR Review - Weekly Changelog 2026-06

Thanks for putting together this weekly changelog! I've reviewed the changes and have some feedback on formatting and content consistency.

✅ Strengths

• Frontmatter follows the required format with all mandatory fields (author, published, category, and optional keywords)
• Good descriptive title and summary
• Content covers multiple product areas (Rivet Cloud, Sandbox Agent, CI/CD)
• Appropriate use of external link for OpenCode

📝 Content & Formatting Issues

1. Inconsistent formatting style

The changelog mixes two different formatting styles. Lines 10-13 use section headers with descriptive sentences, while previous changelogs (2026-01-30) use bullet points with concise items under section headers. For consistency with recent changelogs, consider using bullet points under each section.

2. Missing blank line (line 13-14)

There is no blank line between the Rivet Cloud section and the Sandbox Agent section. This should have a blank line for proper markdown rendering.

3. Extra blank line (line 21-22)

There is an unnecessary double blank line between Gigacode Launch and ARM Builds sections.

4. Clarity issue in Gigacode description (line 19-20)

The statement about not being a fork of Opencode is defensive and unclear. Consider rephrasing to explain what Gigacode IS rather than what it isn't.

5. Week number in title

The title uses 2026-06 which suggests week 6, but the date is February 5th. Verify this matches your week counting convention.

🔍 Minor Observations

• The description in frontmatter is comprehensive and accurately summarizes the changes
• Keywords are well-chosen and relevant
• External link to opencode.ai is appropriate

✏️ Suggested Quick Fixes

1. Add blank line after line 13
2. Remove one blank line at line 22
3. Rephrase the Gigacode description for clarity
4. Consider switching to bullet-point format for consistency with recent changelogs

Security & Performance

✅ No security concerns - this is documentation content only
✅ No performance implications - static content

Overall, this is a good changelog update that just needs some formatting polish for consistency with the established style.