Skip to content

Conversation

@tmandry
Copy link
Member

@tmandry tmandry commented Feb 6, 2026


| Team | Support level | Notes |
| ---- | ------------- | ----- |
| [compiler] | Large | Significant refactoring of the resolver |
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is a direct ask for reviews or at least vibe checks from @petrochenkov

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm a poor substitute for @petrochenkov at best, but I've gotten mildly familiar with some of it as a result of the macro work and I'm happy to provide a second set of eyes where it might help.

@joshtriplett
Copy link
Member

Awesome. I'm planning on submitting a goal for macros; I'd planned to hold back from macro fn and mark it as "future work", but if this goal gets accepted then I'd love to align with it and see if I can make macro fn work this year.

I'm also happy to help with this goal, as needed. That includes sponsoring any potential lang experiments needed to try exposing this functionality.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants