default claude and prettier repo level config

[kernelsam]

Issue number: senzing-garage/template-python#340 senzing-factory/build-resources#245

---

Resolves senzing-garage/template-python#340
Resolves senzing-factory/build-resources#245

[github-actions]

🤖 Claude Code Review

Code Review Results

Code Quality

✅ Code follows style guide

• All files are configuration files (JSON/Markdown) rather than source code
• .vscode/cspell.json:1-16 - Properly formatted JSON with consistent indentation
• .claude/commands/senzing-code-review.md:1-3 - Simple markdown file follows standard markdown conventions
• .claude/settings.local.json:1-3 - Well-formatted JSON

✅ No commented-out code

• .vscode/cspell.json:1-16 - Removed unnecessary comments, which is good cleanup
• No commented-out code present in any files

✅ Meaningful variable names

• .claude/settings.local.json:2 - includeCoAuthoredBy is descriptive and follows camelCase convention
• .vscode/cspell.json:4-12 - All dictionary words are meaningful

✅ DRY principle followed

• No code duplication detected
• Configuration files are appropriately concise

✅ Identify Defects

• No bugs, logic errors, or security vulnerabilities detected
• Configuration values are appropriate for their context

✅ Project memory claude configuration

• No .claude/CLAUDE.md file exists in the repository
• .claude/settings.local.json:1-3 - Settings appear general enough (controls co-authored-by in commits)
• .claude/commands/senzing-code-review.md:1-3 - References external URL, appropriate for shared use

Testing

✅ Unit/Integration tests

• N/A - This PR only contains configuration files (no executable code)

✅ Edge cases covered

• N/A - Configuration files don't require edge case testing

✅ Test coverage

• N/A - No code to test

Documentation

✅ Readme updated if needed

• N/A - These are internal configuration files that don't require README updates

✅ API docs updated

• N/A - No API changes

✅ Inline comments for complex logic

• .vscode/cspell.json:1-16 - Removed redundant comments (lines were previously commented), which improves readability. JSON is self-documenting.

✅ CHANGELOG.md updated

• This appears to be a configuration-only change that may not require CHANGELOG entry
• However, if this is a public-facing repo, consider documenting the new Claude command capability

✅ Markdown files follow CommonMark

• .claude/commands/senzing-code-review.md:1-3 - Valid CommonMark syntax
• No extra whitespaces detected
• Properly formatted structure

Security

✅ No hardcoded credentials

• No credentials, tokens, or secrets detected in any files

✅ Input validation

• N/A - Configuration files only

✅ Proper error handling

• N/A - No executable code

✅ No sensitive data in logs

• No logging code present

✅ No license files flagged

• No .lic files or AQAAAD strings detected

---

Summary

Overall Assessment: ✅ APPROVED

This is a clean PR that adds Claude Code configuration and improves the cspell configuration by:

1. New additions:

   • .claude/commands/senzing-code-review.md:1-3 - Adds a custom slash command for Senzing code reviews
   • .claude/settings.local.json:1-3 - Configures Claude settings (disables co-authored-by)

2. Improvements:

   • .vscode/cspell.json:1-16 - Removes redundant comments, alphabetizes words, adds "esbenp" to dictionary
   • Better formatting and organization

No issues found. All checklist items pass or are not applicable. The changes are configuration-only, properly formatted, and pose no security risks.

Minor recommendation: Consider whether .claude/settings.local.json should be in .gitignore instead of committed, as "local" settings typically aren't shared. However, if this is intentional for team standardization, it's acceptable.

Automated code review analyzing defects and coding standards