default claude and prettier repo level config

[kernelsam]

Issue number: senzing-garage/template-python#340 senzing-factory/build-resources#245

[github-actions]

🤖 Claude Code Review

Automated Code Review

Summary

This PR adds Claude Code configuration files and updates the cSpell dictionary. All changes are configuration-related with no business logic modifications.

---

Detailed Review

Code Quality

✅ Code follows style guide

• No actual code changes to evaluate against style guide
• Configuration files use appropriate JSON/Markdown syntax

✅ No commented-out code

• All files are clean with no commented code blocks

✅ Meaningful variable names

• N/A - No variables introduced in this PR

✅ DRY principle followed

• N/A - No code duplication possible in these config changes

✅ Defects identification

• .claude/commands/senzing-code-review.md:3 - Potential issue: The command references an external URL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/senzing-factory/build-resources/refs/heads/main/claude/pr-prompt.md. This creates a dependency on external content that could change or become unavailable. Consider either:
  1. Embedding the review criteria directly in this file
  2. Versioning the external reference (use a specific commit SHA instead of refs/heads/main)

✅ Project memory claude configuration

• No .claude/CLAUDE.md file exists in the repository, so no project-specific configuration to validate against

Testing

✅ Unit tests for new functions

• N/A - No new functions added

✅ Integration tests for new endpoints

• N/A - No new endpoints added

✅ Edge cases covered

• N/A - Configuration files only

✅ Test coverage > 80%

• N/A - No code requiring test coverage

Documentation

✅ Readme updated if needed

• Not required - internal configuration changes don't affect user-facing functionality

✅ API docs updated

• N/A - No API changes

✅ Inline comments for complex logic

• N/A - No complex logic introduced

❌ CHANGELOG.md updated

• .claude/commands/senzing-code-review.md - No CHANGELOG.md update found. While these are internal development tool configurations, documenting the addition of Claude Code support would be beneficial for team members.

✅ Markdown formatting (CommonMark + Prettier)

• .claude/commands/senzing-code-review.md - File follows CommonMark specification correctly
• No trailing whitespace detected
• Proper line endings

Security

✅ No hardcoded credentials

• All files clean of credentials

✅ Input validation implemented

• N/A - No input handling added

✅ Proper error handling

• N/A - No error-prone code added

✅ No sensitive data in logs

• N/A - No logging code added

✅ No license files (.lic) or AQAAAD strings

• No license files or suspicious license strings detected in the changes

Additional Observations

Positive aspects:

• .vscode/cspell.json - Dictionary is now alphabetically sorted, improving maintainability
• .claude/settings.local.json - Good practice using .local.json for local development settings

Questions/Recommendations:

1. .claude/settings.local.json - The .local suffix typically indicates files that should be gitignored. Is this file intended to be committed? Consider either:

   • Renaming to .claude/settings.json if it should be shared
   • Adding *.local.json to .gitignore if it's truly local-only

2. Consider adding a .claude/README.md explaining the purpose of the senzing-code-review command for team members unfamiliar with Claude Code

---

Recommendation

APPROVE with minor suggestions - The changes are low-risk configuration additions. The external URL dependency in the review command should be addressed for stability, and CHANGELOG documentation would be helpful, but these don't block merging.

Automated code review analyzing defects and coding standards

[docktermj]

Blocked by GDEV-4098

[github-actions]

🤖 Claude Code Review

Now let me check if the markdown file follows the CommonMark specification by examining its structure:

---

Code Review Results

Summary

This PR adds Claude Code configuration files and reorganizes the cspell dictionary. The changes are relatively minor and primarily consist of configuration updates.

---

✅ Code Quality

✅ Code follows style guide

Status: PASS (with note)
The changes are primarily configuration files (JSON and Markdown), not code. The added files follow appropriate formatting conventions for their file types.

✅ No commented-out code

Status: PASS
No commented-out code detected in any of the changed files.

✅ Meaningful variable names

Status: N/A
No variables in this PR - only configuration files.

✅ DRY principle followed

Status: PASS
No code duplication detected.

⚠️ Identify Defects

Status: WARNING
.claude/commands/senzing-code-review.md:3 - The URL reference uses angle brackets <https://...> which is valid CommonMark but may not render as intended in all Markdown processors. Consider using standard link syntax: [link text](URL) for better compatibility.

✅ Project memory claude configuration

Status: N/A
No .claude/CLAUDE.md file exists in the repository, so this check is not applicable.

---

⚠️ Testing

❌ Unit tests for new functions

Status: FAIL
No tests added for the new slash command functionality. While this is a configuration file, there should be verification that the command works as expected.

❌ Integration tests for new endpoints

Status: N/A
No endpoints added.

❌ Edge cases covered

Status: FAIL
No test coverage for the new slash command.

❌ Test coverage > 80%

Status: UNKNOWN
Cannot verify test coverage without running the test suite. Configuration files typically don't have direct test coverage.

---

⚠️ Documentation

❌ Readme updated if needed

Status: NEEDS REVIEW
The addition of a new slash command (/senzing-code-review) should be documented in the README to inform users of its existence and usage. I cannot verify if this was done without reading the README.

✅ API docs updated

Status: N/A
No API changes.

✅ Inline comments for complex logic

Status: PASS
The configuration files are self-explanatory and don't require additional comments.

❌ CHANGELOG.md updated

Status: NEEDS VERIFICATION
Cannot confirm if CHANGELOG.md was updated without reading it. New features (slash command) should typically be documented in the changelog.

⚠️ Markdown files follow CommonMark specification

Status: WARNING
.claude/commands/senzing-code-review.md:3 - The file structure is valid CommonMark, but:

• Uses angle bracket autolinks <URL> instead of standard link syntax
• Has only one content line after the heading (minimal but acceptable)
• Should be verified with prettier formatting

---

✅ Security

✅ No hardcoded credentials

Status: PASS
No credentials detected in any changed files.

✅ Input validation implemented

Status: N/A
Configuration files don't require input validation.

✅ Proper error handling

Status: N/A
No code logic requiring error handling.

✅ No sensitive data in logs

Status: N/A
No logging code added.

✅ No license files (.lic) or AQAAAD strings

Status: PASS
No license files or suspicious base64 strings detected in the diff.

---

Additional Observations

.claude/settings.local.json

• Line 2: The file correctly uses .local.json suffix which suggests it's for local development
• ⚠️ Concern: The file name is .local.json but it's being committed to the repository. Typically, .local.* files are meant to be gitignored and not committed. This should be verified against the intended usage pattern for Claude Code settings.

.vscode/cspell.json

• Lines 5-23: Dictionary words were alphabetically reorganized (uppercase first)
• Line 42: Added "esbenp" (likely referring to VS Code extension author)
• ✅ Good practice: The reorganization improves maintainability
• The alphabetical sorting is correct (uppercase before lowercase)

---

Summary Verdict

Overall Assessment: ⚠️ APPROVE WITH MINOR CONCERNS

Critical Issues: NONE

Issues Requiring Attention:

1. Documentation: Verify README and CHANGELOG.md are updated to document the new /senzing-code-review slash command
2. Settings file: Confirm that .claude/settings.local.json should be committed (vs gitignored)
3. Markdown formatting: Consider using standard link syntax in .claude/commands/senzing-code-review.md:3

Recommendations:

• Add documentation for the new slash command in README
• Consider running prettier on the markdown file to ensure consistent formatting
• Verify the .local.json file should be part of the repository

---

Automated code review analyzing defects and coding standards

[github-actions]

🤖 Claude Code Review

---

Code Review Results

Code Quality

✅ Code follows style guide

• Cannot verify without access to the style guide, but the changes are minimal configuration files
• The JSON files follow proper JSON formatting
• Markdown file follows basic markdown conventions

✅ No commented-out code

• No commented-out code present

✅ Meaningful variable names

• Not applicable - only configuration files with standard keys

✅ DRY principle followed

• Not applicable - configuration files

✅ No defects identified

• The changes are low-risk configuration additions:
  • New Claude command definition
  • Local settings for Git co-authorship
  • cspell dictionary reorganization (alphabetization)

❌ Project memory configuration concern

File: .claude/settings.local.json (lines 1-3)

Issue: The file name suggests this is for local settings (.local.json), but it's being checked into the repository. According to the project's CLAUDE.md at build-resources/.claude/CLAUDE.md:51-52, "The project memory claude configuration should not contain anything that would be specific to a local development environment."

Recommendation: Consider whether includeCoAuthoredBy: false should be:

1. In a non-local settings file if it's a team-wide preference, OR
2. Added to .gitignore if it's truly local-only

Testing

⚠️ Not applicable

• These are configuration files with no testable logic
• No tests needed

Documentation

✅ Markdown follows CommonMark

File: .claude/commands/senzing-code-review.md (lines 1-3)

• The markdown is simple and follows CommonMark specification
• No extra whitespace issues
• Properly formatted

⚠️ CHANGELOG.md not updated

• Could not verify if CHANGELOG.md exists or needs updating
• Per project standards (build-resources/.claude/CLAUDE.md:52), "CHANGELOG.md should be updated for all changes"
• This should be updated if it exists in the repository

✅ Documentation appropriate

• The new command file is self-documenting
• Changes are straightforward and don't require additional inline documentation

Security

✅ No hardcoded credentials

• No credentials present

✅ No sensitive data

• No sensitive information in logs or files

✅ No license files flagged

• No .lic files added
• No AQAAAD strings detected

✅ Input validation

• Not applicable - configuration files only

✅ Error handling

• Not applicable - configuration files only

---

Summary

Overall Assessment: ✅ APPROVED with minor recommendations

The changes are low-risk configuration additions:

1. A new Claude command for code review
2. Local Git settings for co-authorship
3. Alphabetized cspell dictionary

Action Items:

1. ⚠️ Clarify .claude/settings.local.json: Determine if this should be checked in or added to .gitignore
2. ⚠️ Update CHANGELOG.md: If present, add entry for these configuration changes per project standards

No critical issues found. The code is clean, follows formatting standards, and contains no security vulnerabilities.

Automated code review analyzing defects and coding standards

[github-actions]

🤖 Claude Code Review

Code Review Results

Summary

This PR adds Claude Code configuration files for automated code review. The changes are primarily configuration files with no executable code changes.

---

Code Quality

✅ Code follows style guide

• Status: ✅ PASS
• Details: No actual code changes in this PR. The added files are configuration files (.md and .json). The markdown file follows basic markdown conventions.

✅ No commented-out code

• Status: ✅ PASS
• Details: No commented-out code present.

✅ Meaningful variable names

• Status: ✅ PASS
• Details: The JSON setting includeCoAuthoredBy is clear and descriptive.

✅ DRY principle followed

• Status: ✅ PASS
• Details: No code duplication.

⚠️ Identify Defects

• Status: ⚠️ MINOR ISSUE
• Details:
  • .claude/commands/senzing-code-review.md:3: The URL references senzing-factory/build-resources which appears to be a different organization than senzing-garage (mentioned in CLAUDE.md). Verify this is the correct URL and that it's accessible to all developers who will use this tool.

✅ Project memory claude configuration

• Status: ✅ PASS
• Details: The .claude/settings.local.json file has .local in its name, which appropriately indicates it's for local development environments. The includeCoAuthoredBy setting is environment-agnostic and appropriate for general use.

---

Testing

✅ Unit tests for new functions

• Status: ✅ N/A
• Details: No new functions added - only configuration files.

✅ Integration tests for new endpoints

• Status: ✅ N/A
• Details: No new endpoints added.

✅ Edge cases covered

• Status: ✅ N/A
• Details: Not applicable for configuration files.

✅ Test coverage > 80%

• Status: ✅ N/A
• Details: No code changes requiring test coverage.

---

Documentation

⚠️ Readme updated if needed

• Status: ⚠️ RECOMMENDATION
• Details: Consider adding documentation about how to use the /senzing-code-review command to the main README.md or CLAUDE.md file. Developers should know this feature exists and how to invoke it.

✅ API docs updated

• Status: ✅ N/A
• Details: No API changes.

✅ Inline comments for complex logic

• Status: ✅ N/A
• Details: No complex logic added.

❌ CHANGELOG.md updated

• Status: ❌ FAIL
• Details: The CHANGELOG.md should be updated to reflect this new feature (Claude Code review command support).

⚠️ Markdown files follow CommonMark specification

• Status: ⚠️ MINOR ISSUE
• Details:
  • .claude/commands/senzing-code-review.md: The file has proper structure but the URL is on line 3 wrapped in angle brackets. Per CommonMark, this is valid but could be formatted as a proper link for better readability: [code review prompt](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/senzing-factory/build-resources/refs/heads/main/claude/pr-prompt.md). However, the current format is technically valid CommonMark.

---

Security

✅ No hardcoded credentials

• Status: ✅ PASS
• Details: No credentials present.

✅ Input validation implemented

• Status: ✅ N/A
• Details: No input handling code added.

✅ Proper error handling

• Status: ✅ N/A
• Details: No error handling code added.

✅ No sensitive data in logs

• Status: ✅ PASS
• Details: No logging code added.

✅ Flag checked in license files

• Status: ✅ PASS
• Details: No .lic files or AQAAAD strings detected in the diff.

---

Overall Assessment

Recommendation: ✅ APPROVE WITH MINOR SUGGESTIONS

Required Changes

1. ❌ Update CHANGELOG.md to document this new feature

Recommended Changes

1. ⚠️ Verify the URL in .claude/commands/senzing-code-review.md:3 is correct and accessible
2. ⚠️ Add documentation to README.md or CLAUDE.md about the /senzing-code-review command
3. ⚠️ Consider reformatting the URL in the markdown file as a proper link for better readability (optional)

Additional Notes

• The .vscode/cspell.json changes are good - they alphabetize the word list and add legitimate terms used in the codebase
• The .claude/settings.local.json configuration is appropriate for local development settings
• This PR adds useful tooling for automated code reviews, which aligns well with the project's quality standards

---

Automated code review analyzing defects and coding standards

[github-actions]

🤖 Claude Code Review

Code Review Analysis

Code Quality

✅ Code Style Compliance

The changes consist entirely of configuration files - no actual code changes to review against the style guide. Configuration files follow proper JSON/Markdown formatting conventions.

✅ No Commented-Out Code

All files are clean - no commented-out code present.

✅ Meaningful Variable Names

Configuration keys are clear and descriptive (includeCoAuthoredBy, etc.).

✅ DRY Principle

No duplication detected in the minimal configuration changes.

✅ No Defects Identified

These are configuration files with no executable logic. The changes appear safe:

• .claude/commands/senzing-code-review.md - Simple command definition
• .claude/settings.local.json - Boolean flag configuration
• .vscode/cspell.json - Alphabetically sorted dictionary additions

⚠️ Project Memory Configuration (.claude/CLAUDE.md)

The new .claude/settings.local.json file appears appropriate for local development settings (the .local.json suffix suggests this). However, the file is being committed to the repository rather than gitignored.

Recommendation: Consider adding .claude/settings.local.json to .gitignore if this file is intended for local developer-specific settings. If it's meant to be a template or default, consider renaming it to .claude/settings.json or .claude/settings.default.json.

Testing

⚠️ No Tests Required

These are configuration files that don't require unit tests. However, the new /senzing-code-review command functionality should ideally be manually verified to ensure it works as intended.

Recommendation: Manually test the new /senzing-code-review command to verify it correctly fetches and executes the remote prompt.

Documentation

❌ No Documentation Updates

The addition of a new developer command (/senzing-code-review) should be documented.

Issues:

1. No README update explaining the new /senzing-code-review command
2. No CHANGELOG.md entry for this feature addition
3. The command file .claude/commands/senzing-code-review.md:3 references an external URL but provides no context about what it does or when to use it

Recommendation:

• Update README.md with command usage: when to run /senzing-code-review, what it does
• Add CHANGELOG.md entry
• Expand .claude/commands/senzing-code-review.md to include a description of the command's purpose

✅ Markdown Formatting

The .claude/commands/senzing-code-review.md follows CommonMark specification and has no extra whitespace.

Security

✅ No Hardcoded Credentials

No credentials present in the changes.

✅ No Sensitive Data

No sensitive data or license files detected.

⚠️ External URL Reference

.claude/commands/senzing-code-review.md:3 references an external URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/senzing-factory/build-resources/refs/heads/main/claude/pr-prompt.md

Consideration: This creates a dependency on external content that could change without version control. Consider:

• Pinning to a specific commit SHA instead of refs/heads/main
• Or vendoring the prompt content into this repository

✅ No License Files

No .lic files or AQAAAD strings detected.

---

Summary

Approve with Recommendations

The changes are low-risk configuration additions, but require documentation improvements:

1. MUST FIX: Add documentation (README.md, CHANGELOG.md) for the new /senzing-code-review command
2. SHOULD FIX: Clarify whether .claude/settings.local.json should be gitignored or is intentionally committed
3. CONSIDER: Pin external URL to commit SHA for stability

Files Requiring Attention:

• README.md - needs update documenting the new command
• CHANGELOG.md - needs entry
• .gitignore - possibly needs .claude/settings.local.json
• .claude/commands/senzing-code-review.md - could use more descriptive content

---

Automated code review analyzing defects and coding standards