add pull-requests: read permission to verify-dockerfile workflow#283
add pull-requests: read permission to verify-dockerfile workflow#283
Conversation
The verify-dockerfile-refreshed-at-updated reusable workflow needs pull-requests: read to function correctly with the callers permissions.
🤖 Claude Code ReviewPR Code ReviewDiff Summary: Adds Code Quality✅ Style guide: Single-line YAML change, follows existing conventions. ✅ No commented-out code: N/A. ✅ Meaningful variable names: N/A. ✅ DRY principle: N/A. ✅ Defects: No bugs or logic errors. The permission addition is a minimal, targeted change. Adding ✅ CLAUDE.md: No issues; the project config is general and suitable for any developer. Testing✅ Unit/integration tests: Not applicable — this is a CI workflow permission change with no testable logic. Documentation✅ README: No update needed. ✅ API docs: N/A. ✅ Inline comments: The change is self-explanatory; no comment needed. ✅ Markdown formatting: YAML file, not a Markdown document. Security✅ No hardcoded credentials: None present. ✅ Input validation: N/A for a workflow permission block. ✅ Proper error handling: N/A. ✅ No sensitive data in logs: N/A. ✅ No license files (.lic): None present. Permission scope review: SummaryThis is a minimal, low-risk change. The only minor item is the missing CHANGELOG entry, which may or may not be required depending on project conventions. The permission addition is appropriate and follows least-privilege principles.Automated code review analyzing defects and coding standards |
Super-linter summary
All files and directories linted successfully For more information, see the GitHub Actions workflow run Powered by Super-linter |
The verify-dockerfile-refreshed-at-updated reusable workflow needs pull-requests: read to function correctly with the callers permissions.