fix docker-verify-refreshed-at-updated workflow

[kernelsam]

Add pull-requests: read permission to docker-verify-refreshed-at-updated.yaml and remove incorrectly named verify-dockerfile-refreshed-at-updated.yaml.

[github-actions]

🤖 Claude Code Review

PR Code Review

This PR makes two changes to GitHub Actions workflows:

1. Removes comment lines from docker-verify-refreshed-at-updated.yaml and adds pull-requests: read permission
2. Deletes verify-dockerfile-refreshed-at-updated.yaml (a duplicate workflow)

---

Code Quality

• ✅ Style guide: Workflow YAML follows standard formatting conventions.
• ✅ No commented-out code: The removed lines were comments, and their removal is the intent of this change. No other commented-out code present.
• ✅ Meaningful variable names: N/A for workflow files.
• ✅ DRY principle: The deleted verify-dockerfile-refreshed-at-updated.yaml was a near-duplicate of docker-verify-refreshed-at-updated.yaml — removing it reduces duplication. Good cleanup.
• ✅ Defects: No logic errors or bugs. The pull-requests: read permission addition aligns the file with what the deleted workflow already had, ensuring the reusable workflow can function correctly. No race conditions, memory issues, or security concerns.
• ✅ CLAUDE.md: No changes to project configuration; not applicable here.

Testing

• ✅ Unit/integration tests: No application logic changed; workflow-level testing is handled by CI execution.
• ✅ Edge cases: N/A.
• ✅ Coverage: N/A.

Documentation

• ✅ README: No user-facing functionality changed.
• ✅ API docs: N/A.
• ✅ Inline comments: The removed comments described a required status check configuration. If that information is needed anywhere, it should live in a project wiki or README rather than inline in the workflow file — their removal is acceptable.
• ✅ CHANGELOG.md: Not present in the diff, but this is an infrastructure-only fix. Whether a changelog entry is required depends on project policy; it's minor enough that omission is reasonable.
• ✅ Markdown: No markdown files changed.

Security

• ✅ No hardcoded credentials: None present.
• ✅ Input validation: N/A.
• ✅ Error handling: N/A.
• ✅ Sensitive data in logs: N/A.
• ✅ License files: None present.

---

Summary

This is a clean, minimal infrastructure fix. The deleted workflow was redundant — it had no trigger restrictions (on: pull_request with no branch filter) and duplicated the functionality of the remaining workflow. The pull-requests: read permission addition is a necessary correctness fix for the reusable workflow to operate. No concerns.

Automated code review analyzing defects and coding standards

[github-actions]

Super-linter summary

Language	Validation result
CHECKOV	Pass ✅
GITHUB_ACTIONS	Pass ✅
GITHUB_ACTIONS_ZIZMOR	Pass ✅
GITLEAKS	Pass ✅
GIT_MERGE_CONFLICT_MARKERS	Pass ✅
JSCPD	Pass ✅
PRE_COMMIT	Pass ✅
SPELL_CODESPELL	Pass ✅
TRIVY	Pass ✅
YAML	Pass ✅
YAML_PRETTIER	Pass ✅

All files and directories linted successfully

For more information, see the GitHub Actions workflow run

Powered by Super-linter