default claude and prettier repo level config

[kernelsam]

Issue number: senzing-garage/template-python#340 senzing-factory/build-resources#245

---

Resolves senzing-garage/template-python#340
Resolves senzing-factory/build-resources#245

[github-actions]

🤖 Claude Code Review

I'll proceed with the code review based on the diff content and general best practices:

---

🔍 Code Review Results

Code Quality

✅ Code follows style guide

• All files follow standard formatting conventions
• JSON files are properly formatted with correct indentation
• Markdown file uses proper structure

✅ No commented-out code

• No commented code blocks found in the diff

✅ Meaningful variable names

• .claude/settings.local.json:2 - includeCoAuthoredBy is descriptive and follows camelCase convention
• All cspell words are meaningful additions

✅ DRY principle followed

• No code duplication detected in this PR

✅ Identify Defects

No critical defects found. However, minor observations:

• .claude/commands/senzing-code-review.md:3 - The command references an external URL for the review prompt. This creates a dependency on external availability. Consider: Is this intentional for centralized management or should it be versioned locally?
• .claude/settings.local.json - The .local. pattern typically indicates local-only configuration that shouldn't be committed. However, this appears intentional as a default local configuration template.

⚠️ Project Memory Configuration

• .claude/CLAUDE.md does not exist in the repository, so no project-specific review considerations apply

Testing

⚠️ Unit tests for new functions

• N/A - This PR only adds configuration files, no executable code requiring unit tests

⚠️ Integration tests for new endpoints

• N/A - No new endpoints added

⚠️ Edge cases covered

• N/A - No logic to test

⚠️ Test coverage > 80%

• N/A - Configuration-only changes

Documentation

✅ Readme updated if needed

• No README updates needed for these configuration additions

✅ API docs updated

• N/A - No API changes

✅ Inline comments for complex logic

• N/A - No complex logic in configuration files

⚠️ CHANGELOG.md updated

• Not checked - The diff doesn't show CHANGELOG.md updates. For configuration additions, this may or may not be necessary depending on project conventions.

✅ Markdown files follow CommonMark specification

• .claude/commands/senzing-code-review.md - Properly formatted:
  • Uses ATX heading (#)
  • List item is properly structured
  • No extra whitespace detected
  • Clean formatting overall

Security

✅ No hardcoded credentials

• No credentials found in any files

✅ Input validation implemented

• N/A - Configuration files don't process input

✅ Proper error handling

• N/A - No executable code

✅ No sensitive data in logs

• N/A - No logging code added

✅ No license files (.lic) or AQAAAD strings

• No license files or suspicious encoded strings detected

---

📋 Summary

Overall Assessment: ✅ APPROVED with minor notes

This PR adds development tooling configuration files:

1. A Claude command for Senzing code reviews
2. Local Claude settings
3. Expanded cspell dictionary with project-specific terms

Key Findings:

Positives:

• All files are properly formatted
• No security concerns
• Alphabetically sorted cspell additions (good maintenance practice)
• Appropriate configuration structure

Notes:

1. .claude/settings.local.json - Consider if this should be in .gitignore instead, or if it's intentionally a template for local settings
2. .claude/commands/senzing-code-review.md:3 - External URL dependency; ensure the referenced URL is stable and version-controlled
3. CHANGELOG.md - Verify if your project conventions require changelog updates for tooling configuration changes

Files Modified:

• .claude/commands/senzing-code-review.md (new)
• .claude/settings.local.json (new)
• .vscode/cspell.json (updated with 25 new words, alphabetically sorted)

Risk Level: ⬇️ Low - Configuration-only changes with no impact on runtime behavior

Automated code review analyzing defects and coding standards