standardize workflows for build-resources v4#213
Conversation
🤖 Claude Code ReviewPR Code Review ResultsSummaryThis PR standardizes GitHub Actions workflows to use Code Quality✅ Code follows our style guideAll YAML files follow proper formatting conventions with consistent quoting and indentation. ✅ No commented-out codeThe diff shows commented code was removed (lines 1-2 in ✅ Meaningful variable namesVariable names remain clear and consistent (e.g., ✅ DRY principle followedThe changes standardize repeated patterns across multiple workflow files, improving maintainability.
|
c5a1c89 to
208e145
Compare
208e145 to
f20b31d
Compare
🤖 Claude Code ReviewI'll conduct a thorough code review of this pull request against the provided checklist. Code Review for PR: Workflow Updates to v4Code Quality✅ Code follows style guideThe changes follow YAML best practices and maintain consistent formatting throughout. All workflow files use proper indentation and structure. ✅ No commented-out codeAll commented code has been removed. For example, in ✅ Meaningful variable namesAll variable and parameter names remain clear and descriptive (e.g., ✅ DRY principle followedThe changes consolidate workflows by upgrading to v4 of shared workflow templates, reducing duplication across the repository. ✅ No defects identifiedThe changes are primarily configuration updates:
One observation: ✅ Project memory complianceThe changes align with the project structure. No environment-specific configurations were added to Testing
|
Super-linter summary
All files and directories linted successfully For more information, see the GitHub Actions workflow run Powered by Super-linter |
Summary
.outputs.job-statuswith.resultSLACK_CHANNELsecret to slack notification callers@v4kernelsamandcooldownto cspell dictionary