standardize workflows for build-resources v4#340
Conversation
6725736 to
d1c0c26
Compare
d1c0c26 to
05cf505
Compare
🤖 Claude Code ReviewCode Review: Standardize workflows for build-resources v4SummaryThis PR upgrades workflow references from Review Checklist ResultsCode Quality✅ Code follows style guide
✅ No commented-out code
✅ Meaningful variable names
✅ DRY principle followed
✅ Identify Defects
✅ Project memory configuration (
Testing✅ Unit tests for new functions
✅ Integration tests for new endpoints
✅ Edge cases covered
✅ Test coverage > 80%
Documentation✅ Readme updated if needed
✅ API docs updated
✅ Inline comments for complex logic
❌ CHANGELOG.md updated
✅ Markdown files follow CommonMark specification
Security✅ No hardcoded credentials
✅ Input validation implemented
✅ Proper error handling
✅ No sensitive data in logs
✅ No license files (.lic) or license keys
Detailed FindingsImprovements in this PR:
Issues to Address:
Recommendations
Overall AssessmentStatus: ✅ Approved with minor fixes recommended This is a solid infrastructure upgrade that standardizes the workflow configuration and upgrades to newer reusable workflow versions. The changes are systematic and consistent across all files. The main issue is the invalid
|
Super-linter summary
All files and directories linted successfully For more information, see the GitHub Actions workflow run Powered by Super-linter |
Summary
.outputs.job-statuswith.resultSLACK_CHANNELsecret to slack notification callers@v4kernelsamandcooldownto cspell dictionary