default claude and prettier repo level config#211
Conversation
🤖 Claude Code ReviewLet me proceed with the review based on the diff content: Code Review ResultsCode Quality✅ Code follows style guide - The changes are minimal configuration files (JSON and Markdown). No procedural code to evaluate against style guidelines. ✅ No commented-out code - All files contain active configuration/documentation only. ✅ Meaningful variable names - The JSON properties ( ✅ DRY principle followed - No code duplication present in these configuration changes. ✅ Identify Defects - No bugs, logic errors, or security vulnerabilities detected:
Testing❌ Unit tests for new functions - N/A (configuration files only, no executable code) ❌ Integration tests for new endpoints - N/A (no new endpoints) ❌ Edge cases covered - N/A (no code logic to test) ❌ Test coverage > 80% - N/A (configuration changes don't affect test coverage) Documentation✅ Readme updated if needed - Not required; these are developer tooling configuration files that don't affect user-facing functionality. ✅ API docs updated - N/A (no API changes) ✅ Inline comments for complex logic - N/A (no complex logic in configuration files) ✅ Markdown files follow CommonMark - Security✅ No hardcoded credentials - No credentials present in any files. ✅ Input validation implemented - N/A (configuration files only) ✅ Proper error handling - N/A (no executable code) ✅ No sensitive data in logs - No logging code present. ✅ No license files (.lic) or AQAAAD strings - No license files or encoded license strings detected. SummaryOverall Assessment: ✅ APPROVED with minor notes This PR adds developer tooling configuration:
Observations:
Action Items:
Automated code review analyzing defects and coding standards |
Issue number: senzing-garage/template-python#340 senzing-factory/build-resources#245
Resolves senzing-garage/template-python#340
Resolves senzing-factory/build-resources#245