standardize workflows for build-resources v4#233
Conversation
🤖 Claude Code ReviewI'll review this pull request against the checklist. Let me analyze the diff. Code ReviewCode Quality✅ Code follows style guide - This PR only modifies GitHub Actions workflow files and configuration (YAML), not application code. The YAML formatting follows GitHub Actions conventions. ✅ No commented-out code - All changes are active configuration updates, no commented code present. ✅ Meaningful variable names - N/A - This is configuration, not code with variables. ✅ DRY principle followed - The changes systematically update workflow references from v3 to v4, which is appropriate for this type of migration. ✅ Identify Defects - No logic errors, bugs, or security vulnerabilities detected. The changes are:
✅ Project memory configuration (./.claude/CLAUDE.md) - The existing TestingDocumentation✅ Readme updated if needed - No README update needed - these are internal workflow changes that don't affect end-user functionality. ✅ API docs updated - N/A - No API changes. ✅ Inline comments for complex logic - N/A - YAML workflow files are self-documenting. ❌ CHANGELOG.md updated - There is no visible CHANGELOG.md update in this diff. Workflow migrations from v3 to v4 should be documented, as this is a significant infrastructure change. ✅ Markdown files follow CommonMark specification - The only markdown reference is in Security✅ No hardcoded credentials - All sensitive values properly use GitHub secrets (e.g., ✅ Input validation implemented - N/A - These are workflow configurations, not input-processing code. ✅ Proper error handling - The workflows already include proper failure conditions with ✅ No sensitive data in logs - All sensitive values are passed via secrets, not exposed in workflow definitions. ✅ No checked in license files (.lic) or AQAAAD strings - No license files or license strings detected in the diff. SummaryOverall Assessment: ✅ APPROVED with minor recommendation This is a clean infrastructure upgrade migrating GitHub Actions workflows from build-resources v3 to v4. The changes are systematic and consistent:
Minor Recommendation:
No blocking issues found. The PR is ready to merge.Automated code review analyzing defects and coding standards |
b9e7599 to
5806045
Compare
5806045 to
fdd235a
Compare
🤖 Claude Code ReviewI'll analyze this PR diff against the review checklist. Code Review AnalysisCode Quality✅ Code follows style guide - This PR contains only YAML configuration changes for GitHub workflows and Dependabot. The YAML formatting is consistent and follows proper conventions. ✅ No commented-out code - No commented code detected in the diff. ✅ Meaningful variable names - All variable/field names are descriptive and follow GitHub Actions conventions (e.g., ✅ DRY principle followed - The changes standardize workflow references from ✅ Identify Defects - No bugs, logic errors, or security vulnerabilities detected. The changes are configuration updates that:
✅ Project memory configuration - The Testing✅ Unit tests for new functions - N/A - No functional code changes, only workflow configuration updates. ✅ Integration tests for new endpoints - N/A - No new endpoints added. ✅ Edge cases covered - N/A - Configuration changes. ✅ Test coverage > 80% - N/A - No code changes affecting test coverage. Documentation✅ Readme updated if needed - N/A - Workflow configuration changes don't require README updates. ✅ API docs updated - N/A - No API changes. ✅ Inline comments for complex logic - N/A - YAML configurations are self-documenting. ❌ CHANGELOG.md updated - No CHANGELOG.md update detected. While these are infrastructure changes, upgrading from v3 to v4 of build-resources workflows may be worth documenting. ✅ Markdown formatting - The Security✅ No hardcoded credentials - All sensitive values use GitHub secrets ( ✅ Input validation implemented - N/A - Configuration changes only. ✅ Proper error handling - The conditional checks for failure notifications are properly implemented (e.g., ✅ No sensitive data in logs - No logging of sensitive information. ✅ No license files - No SummaryOverall Assessment: ✅ APPROVED with minor recommendation This is a clean infrastructure update that standardizes the project's GitHub Actions workflows to use build-resources v4. The changes are:
Minor Recommendation:
No blocking issues found. The PR is ready to merge.Automated code review analyzing defects and coding standards |
Super-linter summary
All files and directories linted successfully For more information, see the GitHub Actions workflow run Powered by Super-linter |
🤖 Claude Code ReviewI'll review this pull request against the provided checklist. Let me analyze the diff systematically. Code ReviewCode Quality✅ Code follows style guideThe changes follow Go and YAML formatting standards. The Go changes in ✅ No commented-out codeNo commented-out code found in the diff. ✅ Meaningful variable namesAll variable names are clear and appropriate ( ✅ DRY principle followedNo code duplication detected. The changes are primarily standardization updates. ✅ Identify DefectsNo bugs, logic errors, edge cases, crashes, race conditions, memory leaks, or security vulnerabilities identified. The changes are:
Testing
|
Super-linter summary
All files and directories linted successfully For more information, see the GitHub Actions workflow run Powered by Super-linter |
Summary
.outputs.job-statuswith.resultSLACK_CHANNELsecret to slack notification callers@v4kernelsamandcooldownto cspell dictionary