Combined dependency updates

[arawinters]

Summary

This PR combines all open dependabot PRs into a single PR for easier review and merging.

• Bump @types/d3-time from 3.0.3 to 3.0.4 (Bump @types/d3-time from 3.0.3 to 3.0.4 #812)
• Bump @jridgewell/gen-mapping from 0.3.5 to 0.3.13 (Bump @jridgewell/gen-mapping from 0.3.5 to 0.3.13 #813)
• Bump @inquirer/expand from 4.0.13 to 4.0.23 (Bump @inquirer/expand from 4.0.13 to 4.0.23 #814)
• Bump pump from 3.0.2 to 3.0.3 (Bump pump from 3.0.2 to 3.0.3 #815)
• Bump electron-to-chromium from 1.5.178 to 1.5.267 (Bump electron-to-chromium from 1.5.178 to 1.5.267 #816)
• Bump the npm_and_yarn group across 1 directory with 3 updates (Bump the npm_and_yarn group across 1 directory with 3 updates #817)

Test plan

• Verify npm install succeeds
• Verify build completes without errors
• Verify tests pass

---

Resolves #812
Resolves #813
Resolves #814
Resolves #815
Resolves #816
Resolves #817

[github-actions]

🤖 Claude Code Review

Code Review Report

✅ Code Quality

Style Guide Compliance

✅ PASS - This is a dependency update in package-lock.json and package.json. No custom code style issues to review.

No Commented-Out Code

✅ PASS - No commented-out code present.

Meaningful Variable Names

✅ PASS - N/A for dependency updates.

DRY Principle

✅ PASS - N/A for dependency updates.

Defect Analysis

✅ PASS - This PR updates Angular dependencies:

• @angular/common: ^19.2.11 → ^19.2.16
• @angular/compiler: ^19.2.11 → ^19.2.17

The changes appear to be patch version updates within the same minor version. The package-lock.json shows extensive internal dependency tree restructuring, which is normal for npm lock file updates. No logic errors, security vulnerabilities, or defects identified in the dependency updates themselves.

Project Memory Configuration

✅ PASS - No .claude/CLAUDE.md file exists in this repository based on the git status provided.

---

⚠️ Testing

Unit Tests

⚠️ NEEDS REVIEW - No new unit tests added. For dependency updates, it's recommended to:

• Run existing test suite to ensure compatibility
• Verify no breaking changes were introduced

Integration Tests

⚠️ NEEDS REVIEW - No new integration tests added. Should verify:

• Application builds successfully
• All existing integration tests pass

Edge Cases

✅ PASS - N/A for dependency updates.

Test Coverage

⚠️ CANNOT VERIFY - No test execution results provided. Recommend running:

npm test
npm run build

---

❌ Documentation

README

✅ PASS - No README changes needed for patch dependency updates.

API Docs

✅ PASS - No API changes in this update.

Inline Comments

✅ PASS - N/A for dependency updates.

CHANGELOG.md

❌ FAIL - No CHANGELOG.md update detected. Dependency updates should be documented, especially for Angular framework updates that may contain bug fixes or minor improvements.

Recommendation: Add entry to CHANGELOG.md:

## [Unreleased]
### Changed
- Updated @angular/common from 19.2.11 to 19.2.16
- Updated @angular/compiler from 19.2.11 to 19.2.17

Markdown Formatting

✅ PASS - No markdown files modified in this PR.

---

✅ Security

No Hardcoded Credentials

✅ PASS - No credentials in diff.

Input Validation

✅ PASS - N/A for dependency updates.

Error Handling

✅ PASS - N/A for dependency updates.

Sensitive Data in Logs

✅ PASS - N/A for dependency updates.

License Files

✅ PASS - No .lic files or AQAAAD strings detected in the diff.

---

Summary

Overall Assessment: Mostly compliant with minor issues.

Critical Issues: None

Required Actions:

1. ❌ Update CHANGELOG.md to document the dependency updates
2. ⚠️ Verify test execution - Ensure npm test and npm run build pass successfully

Recommended Actions:

1. Run the full test suite to verify compatibility with Angular 19.2.16/19.2.17
2. Check Angular release notes for these versions to understand what bug fixes/improvements are included
3. Consider reviewing the extensive package-lock.json changes to understand dependency tree restructuring

Risk Level: Low - These are patch version updates within the same minor version, which typically contain bug fixes and should be backward compatible.

Automated code review analyzing defects and coding standards

[github-actions]

🤖 Claude Code Review

Combined Code Review

Review Part 1 of 4

I'll analyze this first part of the PR diff against the review checklist.

Code Review - Part 1 of 4

Code Quality

✅ Dependency Updates: This appears to be a dependency update PR, primarily updating Angular packages from 19.2.11 to 19.2.17 and related build tools.

✅ No commented-out code: Clean diff with no commented code

✅ Meaningful naming: N/A for dependency updates

✅ DRY principle: N/A for dependency updates

✅ Defects/Issues Identified:

⚠️ Potential peer dependency conflicts: The package-lock.json shows several version updates that need verification:

• Angular packages updated from ^19.2.11 to ^19.2.16/19.2.17
• Angular CDK/Material updated to 19.2.19
• Various @Angular-devkit packages updated to 0.1902.19
• Babel packages updated to 7.26.10 and 7.28.x versions
• Multiple @compodoc packages with significant version changes

Specific concerns:

1. Line ~1300: Angular Material is at 19.2.19 while core Angular packages are at 19.2.17 - verify compatibility

2. Lines 2774-2836: Major version changes in @compodoc/compodoc dependencies:

   • @angular-devkit/schematics: 18.2.8 → 20.3.4
   • @babel/core: 7.25.8 → 7.28.4
   • cheerio: 1.0.0-rc.12 → 1.1.2
   • commander: ^12.1.0 → ^14.0.1
   • i18next: ^23.16.0 → 25.5.3

3. Lines 3840+: New dependencies added (@arr/every, @polka/send-type, body-parser, etc.) - ensure these are intentional

Testing

❌ No test files visible in this diff part - Cannot verify test coverage for dependency changes

⚠️ Integration testing needed: Major dependency updates require thorough integration testing to ensure:

• Build process still works
• No runtime errors
• All Angular features function correctly
• Development server runs properly

Documentation

❌ CHANGELOG.md not visible in this part - Need to verify it's updated

✅ No README changes needed for dependency updates

Security

✅ No hardcoded credentials visible

✅ No sensitive data in logs

✅ No .lic files or AQAAAD strings detected

⚠️ Security considerations:

• Multiple major/minor version bumps should be reviewed for security advisories
• New transitive dependencies introduced should be scanned for vulnerabilities

---

Summary for Part 1

Critical Issues: None

Warnings:

1. Version mismatches between Angular Material (19.2.19) and Angular core (19.2.17)
2. Major version jumps in @compodoc dependencies need careful testing
3. Multiple new transitive dependencies added
4. Need to verify CHANGELOG.md is updated (not visible in this part)

Recommendations:

1. Run npm audit to check for security vulnerabilities
2. Perform full integration test suite
3. Verify peer dependency compatibility
4. Test build and dev server functionality
5. Confirm all new dependencies are intentional and necessary

Awaiting remaining parts of the diff to complete the review.

---

Review Part 2 of 4

I'll review this section of the PR diff (part 2 of 4), which appears to be mostly npm dependency updates in package-lock.json.

Code Review - Part 2 of 4

Summary

This section contains dependency updates in package-lock.json, primarily showing version bumps and new optional dependencies for the build system and development tools.

Key Observations

✅ Positive Changes

1. Security Updates: Many dependencies appear to be updated to newer versions, which typically includes security patches
2. Consistent Versioning: Version updates appear systematic and follow semantic versioning

⚠️ Potential Issues

Major Version Changes:

• body-parser: Updated from 1.20.3 to 2.2.1 (major version bump)

  • Location: Multiple instances including line ~10424
  • ⚠️ Risk: Major version changes may introduce breaking changes
  • Recommendation: Verify API compatibility and test thoroughly

• commander: Multiple version updates (7.x → 12.x → 14.x)

  • Location: ~10359
  • ⚠️ Risk: Major version jumps could affect CLI functionality

• ansi-escapes: 4.3.2 → 7.2.0

  • Location: ~6212
  • ⚠️ Risk: Major version change in terminal output handling

Security Concerns:

• ❌ No .lic files detected in this section (good)
• ❌ No AQAAAD strings detected (good)
• ✅ No hardcoded credentials visible

Deprecated Dependencies:

• inflight: Marked as deprecated with memory leak warning
  • Location: ~10360
  • Recommendation: Consider replacing with lru-cache as suggested

Package Integrity:

• ✅ All packages have integrity hashes (SHA-512)
• ✅ Resolved URLs point to npm registry

📋 Checklist Items

Code Quality:

• ✅ No code style issues (lock file is auto-generated)
• ✅ No commented-out code
• ✅ No meaningful variable names to review (lock file)
• N/A DRY principle
• N/A Defects in business logic

Testing:

• ⚠️ Cannot determine test coverage from lock file alone
• Recommendation: Ensure integration tests cover the updated dependencies

Documentation:

• ✅ Lock file is self-documenting with version info
• ⚠️ Check if CHANGELOG.md documents these dependency updates

Security:

• ✅ No hardcoded credentials
• ✅ No sensitive data visible
• ✅ No .lic files or AQAAAD strings
• ⚠️ Multiple major version bumps require security audit

Specific Recommendations

1. Test Critical Dependencies:

   - body-parser (2.x)
   - express dependencies
   - karma test runner
   - build tooling (webpack, rollup)
   

2. Deprecated Package:

   • Replace inflight usage to avoid memory leaks
   • Check what depends on it: npm ls inflight

3. Breaking Changes Review:

   • Review release notes for major version changes
   • Ensure backward compatibility where needed

4. Security Audit:

   npm audit
   npm audit fix

Verdict

⚠️ CONDITIONAL APPROVAL - The dependency updates appear reasonable, but the multiple major version changes require:

1. Thorough integration testing
2. Review of breaking changes in major versions
3. Security audit completion
4. Verification that deprecated packages are addressed

---

Review Part 3 of 4

I'll analyze Part 3 of the PR diff against the review checklist.

Code Review - Part 3 of 4

Code Quality ✅

• Code follows style guide: ✅ This section contains only dependency updates (package-lock.json), no actual code changes
• No commented-out code: ✅ N/A for lock file
• Meaningful variable names: ✅ N/A for lock file
• DRY principle: ✅ N/A for lock file
• Identify Defects: ✅ No code defects - only dependency version updates

Key Observations:

Notable Dependency Updates:

1. karma dependencies - Multiple updates to karma-related packages and nested dependencies
2. vite - Appears to be a new addition (6.4.1) with all its rollup platform-specific dependencies
3. vis-network (10.0.2) and related vis-* packages - Network visualization library updates
4. webpack-dev-server - Updated from 5.2.0 to 5.2.2
5. Multiple build tool updates - webpack, rollup, postcss, etc.

Security Considerations:

• Several packages marked as deprecated:
  • glob versions prior to v9
  • rimraf versions prior to v4
  • inflight (no longer maintained)
  • whatwg-encoding (use @exodus/bytes instead)

⚠️ RECOMMENDATION: These deprecated packages should be updated in a future PR to avoid security vulnerabilities.

Potential Issues:

1. vis-data and vis-util are marked as "peer": true but vis-network has peer dependencies on them. Need to ensure peer dependencies are properly satisfied.

2. vite is now included (was previously peer-only based on "peer": true in earlier chunks). This is a significant addition that should be verified as intentional.

Testing ❌

• Unit tests: ⚠️ Cannot determine from lock file alone
• Integration tests: ⚠️ Cannot determine from lock file alone
• Edge cases: ⚠️ Cannot determine from lock file alone
• Test coverage: ⚠️ Cannot determine from lock file alone

Documentation ❌

• Readme updated: ⚠️ Not visible in this section
• API docs: ⚠️ N/A for dependencies
• Inline comments: ⚠️ N/A for lock file
• CHANGELOG.md: ⚠️ Not visible in this section

Security ✅

• No hardcoded credentials: ✅ N/A for lock file
• Input validation: ✅ N/A for lock file
• Proper error handling: ✅ N/A for lock file
• No sensitive data in logs: ✅ N/A for lock file
• License files: ✅ No .lic files detected with AQAAAD strings in this section

Summary:

Part 3 Status: ✅ APPROVED with recommendations

This section contains standard dependency updates in package-lock.json. The main concerns are:

1. Several deprecated packages that should be updated in a future PR
2. Peer dependency management for vis-* packages needs verification
3. Vite addition should be confirmed as intentional

No blocking issues found in this section, but monitoring of deprecated dependencies is recommended for security maintenance.

---

Review Part 4 of 4

Code Review - Part 4 of 4

Analyzing the provided diff (dependency updates in package-lock.json and package.json).

---

Code Quality

✅ Code follows style guide

The changes are automated dependency updates in lock files and configuration - no custom code style applies.

✅ No commented-out code

No commented-out code present in this section.

✅ Meaningful variable names

N/A - These are dependency declarations, not custom code.

✅ DRY principle followed

N/A - Lock file entries are generated automatically.

✅ Identify Defects

No critical defects found. The changes consist of:

• Angular core package updates from 19.2.11 to 19.2.16 (patch version bump)
• Minor dependency updates (zone.js, yocto-queue, yoctocolors-cjs)
• Addition of yargs transitive dependencies with proper version specifications

Observations:

• All dependency version bumps appear to be patch/minor updates
• No breaking changes expected based on semver
• Lock file integrity hashes are properly updated
• All licenses remain MIT (no licensing concerns)

---

Testing

⚠️ Unit tests for new functions

N/A - This is a dependency update, not new functionality. However, recommendation: Ensure existing test suite runs successfully against updated Angular 19.2.16.

⚠️ Integration tests for new endpoints

N/A - No new endpoints in this change.

⚠️ Edge cases covered

N/A - But regression testing recommended for dependency updates.

⚠️ Test coverage > 80%

Cannot verify from this diff. Should be validated in CI/CD pipeline.

---

Documentation

✅ Readme updated if needed

N/A - Dependency updates typically don't require README changes unless there are breaking changes or new setup requirements. Angular 19.2.11→19.2.16 is a patch update.

✅ API docs updated

N/A - No API changes in dependency updates.

✅ Inline comments for complex logic

N/A - Lock files don't contain custom logic.

❌ CHANGELOG.md updated

Issue: The diff shows dependency updates but no corresponding CHANGELOG.md entry.

Recommendation: Add an entry like:

## [Version] - YYYY-MM-DD
### Changed
- Updated Angular core packages from 19.2.11 to 19.2.16
- Updated Angular Material/CDK to 19.2.16
- Updated zone.js from 0.15.0 to 0.15.1
- Updated various dev dependencies (yocto-queue, yoctocolors-cjs)

✅ Markdown files follow CommonMark

N/A - No markdown changes in this section.

---

Security

✅ No hardcoded credentials

No credentials present.

✅ Input validation implemented

N/A - No custom validation code in this section.

✅ Proper error handling

N/A - Lock file updates.

✅ No sensitive data in logs

No logging code present.

✅ No license files (.lic) or AQAAAD strings

No .lic files or AQAAAD strings detected in this diff section.

---

Summary for Part 4

Critical Issues: 0

Major Issues: 1

• ❌ Missing CHANGELOG.md entry for dependency updates

Minor Issues: 0

Recommendations:

1. Update CHANGELOG.md to document the Angular version bump and other dependency updates
2. Verify CI/CD passes with updated dependencies (tests, build, lint)
3. Consider testing in a staging environment before merging, particularly for the Angular framework update

Overall Assessment:

This section contains routine dependency maintenance with no code quality or security concerns. The only missing item is changelog documentation. The dependency updates appear safe (patch versions within Angular 19.2.x).

---

---

Automated code review analyzing defects and coding standards