Skip to content

Comments

default claude and prettier repo level config#76

Merged
kernelsam merged 1 commit intomainfrom
skern-build-resources-updates
Dec 3, 2025
Merged

default claude and prettier repo level config#76
kernelsam merged 1 commit intomainfrom
skern-build-resources-updates

Conversation

@kernelsam
Copy link
Contributor

@kernelsam kernelsam commented Dec 3, 2025

@kernelsam kernelsam requested a review from a team as a code owner December 3, 2025 17:30
@kernelsam kernelsam enabled auto-merge (squash) December 3, 2025 18:04
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Dec 3, 2025

🤖 Claude Code Review

Automated Code Review

I'll analyze this pull request against the provided checklist.

Code Quality

Code follows style guide - The changes are minimal configuration files (JSON and Markdown). The Markdown file follows CommonMark specification with proper structure.

No commented-out code - No commented-out code present in this diff.

Meaningful variable names - The JSON configuration uses clear, descriptive keys (includeCoAuthoredBy).

DRY principle followed - No code duplication present in these configuration changes.

No defects identified - These are simple configuration additions with no logic errors, edge cases, or security vulnerabilities. The changes are:

  • A new Claude command file that references an external code review prompt
  • A local settings file for Claude configuration
  • Alphabetical reorganization of the cSpell dictionary

⚠️ Project memory (CLAUDE.md) consideration - The new .claude/commands/senzing-code-review.md file references an external URL for code review instructions. This is appropriate and general enough for any developer. The .claude/settings.local.json file is correctly named with .local suffix, indicating it's for local configuration.

Testing

N/A - These are configuration files that don't require unit or integration tests. No functional code changes.

Documentation

Documentation appropriate - The new command file is self-documenting. No README or CHANGELOG updates needed for internal tooling configuration.

Markdown follows CommonMark - The .claude/commands/senzing-code-review.md file:

  • Has proper heading structure
  • Uses standard list syntax
  • Contains no extra whitespace
  • Follows prettier formatting

Security

No hardcoded credentials - No credentials present.

No sensitive data - The configuration files contain only benign settings.

No license files or AQAAAD strings - Not present in this diff.

⚠️ External URL dependency - .claude/commands/senzing-code-review.md:3 references https://raw.githubusercontent.com/senzing-factory/build-resources/refs/heads/main/claude/pr-prompt.md. While not a security issue per se, this creates a dependency on an external resource. Consider:

  • Ensuring the referenced repository is under your organization's control
  • The URL pointing to a specific commit SHA rather than refs/heads/main for stability
  • Documenting what happens if that URL becomes unavailable

Additional Observations

cSpell dictionary reorganization - .vscode/cspell.json:5-93 alphabetically sorts the dictionary entries. This is a positive change that:

  • Improves maintainability
  • Makes it easier to avoid duplicates
  • Follows organizational standards
  • Adds new entries: DYLD, DONT, esbenp

Summary

Overall Assessment: ✅ APPROVED

This PR makes clean, focused changes to development tooling configuration:

  1. Adds Claude Code review command integration
  2. Configures local Claude settings
  3. Improves cSpell dictionary organization

No functional code changes, security concerns, or defects identified. The only minor consideration is the external URL dependency for the code review prompt, which should be evaluated based on your organization's practices.

Automated code review analyzing defects and coding standards

@kernelsam kernelsam merged commit 77bb5ad into main Dec 3, 2025
36 checks passed
@kernelsam kernelsam deleted the skern-build-resources-updates branch December 3, 2025 19:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

repo level claude config

2 participants