default claude and prettier repo level config#76
Conversation
🤖 Claude Code ReviewAutomated Code ReviewI'll analyze this pull request against the provided checklist. Code Quality✅ Code follows style guide - The changes are minimal configuration files (JSON and Markdown). The Markdown file follows CommonMark specification with proper structure. ✅ No commented-out code - No commented-out code present in this diff. ✅ Meaningful variable names - The JSON configuration uses clear, descriptive keys ( ✅ DRY principle followed - No code duplication present in these configuration changes. ✅ No defects identified - These are simple configuration additions with no logic errors, edge cases, or security vulnerabilities. The changes are:
TestingN/A - These are configuration files that don't require unit or integration tests. No functional code changes. Documentation✅ Documentation appropriate - The new command file is self-documenting. No README or CHANGELOG updates needed for internal tooling configuration. ✅ Markdown follows CommonMark - The
Security✅ No hardcoded credentials - No credentials present. ✅ No sensitive data - The configuration files contain only benign settings. ✅ No license files or AQAAAD strings - Not present in this diff.
Additional Observations✅ cSpell dictionary reorganization -
SummaryOverall Assessment: ✅ APPROVED This PR makes clean, focused changes to development tooling configuration:
No functional code changes, security concerns, or defects identified. The only minor consideration is the external URL dependency for the code review prompt, which should be evaluated based on your organization's practices.Automated code review analyzing defects and coding standards |
Issue number: senzing-garage/template-python#340 senzing-factory/build-resources#245
Resolves senzing-garage/template-python#340
Resolves senzing-factory/build-resources#245