Skip to content

Conversation

@alphabetc1
Copy link
Contributor

Motivation

Modifications

Accuracy Tests

Benchmarking and Profiling

Checklist

Review Process

  1. Ping Merge Oncalls to start the PR flow. See the PR Merge Process.
  2. Get approvals from CODEOWNERS and other reviewers.
  3. Trigger CI tests with comments or contact authorized users to do so.
    • /tag-run-ci-label, /rerun-failed-ci, /tag-and-rerun-ci
  4. After green CI and required approvals, ask Merge Oncalls to merge.

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @alphabetc1, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request, explicitly marked as 'Do NOT MERGE', introduces a trivial, non-functional change to python/sglang/utils.py. The primary purpose appears to be related to testing, possibly to trigger CI or validate a workflow, rather than implementing a functional code fix.

Highlights

  • Test Fix (DO NOT MERGE): A minor, non-functional change was introduced in python/sglang/utils.py by adding a blank line. This pull request is explicitly marked as 'Do NOT MERGE', suggesting its purpose is for testing or as a temporary placeholder rather than a functional code change.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Changelog
  • python/sglang/utils.py
    • Added a blank line within the wait_for_server function for an unknown, likely non-functional, purpose.
Ignored Files
  • Ignored by pattern: .github/workflows/** (1)
    • .github/workflows/execute-notebook.yml
Activity
  • The pull request was created by alphabetc1 with a title indicating it's a test fix and explicitly marked 'Do NOT MERGE'.
  • The PR description template was largely left empty, reinforcing the idea that this is not a standard feature or bug fix PR.
  • A single, non-functional code change was committed, adding a blank line to python/sglang/utils.py.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request introduces a minor stylistic change in python/sglang/utils.py by adding a blank line within the wait_for_server function. This change improves code separation and readability. It is a correct and safe modification, and I have no further feedback.

@alphabetc1
Copy link
Contributor Author

/tag-and-rerun-ci

@github-actions github-actions bot added the run-ci label Feb 7, 2026
@zhaochenyang20
Copy link
Collaborator

#18429

#18429 PR is used to test #18417 PR:

#18417

Basically, we want any code change that is non-markdown only to trigger execute notebook.

Adter #18417 changed, it should works!

@alphabetc1 alphabetc1 closed this Feb 10, 2026
@alphabetc1 alphabetc1 deleted the fix/test3 branch February 10, 2026 13:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants