Fix resource identifier binding validation#2526
Merged
Conversation
This commit fixes a bug where only the names of identifiers were validated, not the ShapeId that represent them, when testing the binding of operations to resources.
yefrig
approved these changes
Feb 18, 2025
...a/software/amazon/smithy/model/validation/validators/ResourceIdentifierBindingValidator.java
Show resolved
Hide resolved
yasmewad
approved these changes
Feb 18, 2025
Contributor
|
I think this broke one of my models. Is there a way to model an API which accept a single string field which can be one of multiple ways to identify a resource? Example -- I have an API that is similar to |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This commit fixes a bug where only the names of identifiers were validated, not the ShapeId that represent them, when testing the binding of operations to resources.
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.