GH-5229: Support Gemini Computer use#5335
Open
yasu89 wants to merge 1 commit intospring-projects:mainfrom
Open
GH-5229: Support Gemini Computer use#5335yasu89 wants to merge 1 commit intospring-projects:mainfrom
yasu89 wants to merge 1 commit intospring-projects:mainfrom
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Wada Yasuhiro <19990967+yasu89@users.noreply.github.com>
Member
|
@ddobrin Could you help with the review of this PR? Thanks! |
Author
|
I’ve created a demo implementation using this PR to demonstrate the Computer Use feature: |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Prerequisite: the bug fix in #5007 is required.
This PR adds support for Gemini’s Computer Use feature. Close #5229
https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/computer-use
partsmust include a screenshot and the current URL.ToolCallResultclass so tool call results can store new metadata inToolResponse.parts.If there’s a better approach for implementing FunctionResponse
parts, I’m happy to adjust.