-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 28
Nsr/580/missing collection error #1029
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
naterubin
merged 7 commits into
stac-utils:main
from
naterubin:nsr/580/missing-collection-error
Feb 5, 2026
Merged
Changes from 4 commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
afa715d
require Items to have collection
naterubin 3cc9e18
Update invalid quick links in README
naterubin a56c180
update changelog
naterubin 04d74be
Merge branch 'main' into nsr/580/missing-collection-error
naterubin 22ad839
update error message
naterubin b91eace
fix audit errors
naterubin ecd87ac
update audit ignore list
naterubin File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm assuming we can't do any model validation and are just directly checking for the key since this is just vanilla JS?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Pretty much, yeah. There is a library (that is used in other places in stac-server) called
zodthat is pretty similar topydanticin the JS world, but there isn't the level of integration with the web framework in this case as in theFastAPIworld. I definitely thought about adding full on payload model validation, but that would be a significant addition and it felt like a lot for a small bugfix. Definitely open to creating a ticket suggesting adding it...There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I feel like all the model stuff should probably come with the typescript change over. I know that's gonna be a substantial move so not sure where that fits on the roadmap.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, that's a good point, the model/typing integration could work really well.