You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Raw RINEX validation of distance-structured correlations in GNSS atomic clocks. Detects exponential decay signatures (λ≈1-4 km) in 539 stations using SPP with broadcast ephemerides, eliminating processing artifact hypothesis. Shows E-W>N-S anisotropy, CMB alignment, orbital coupling. TEP-GNSS Paper 3.
Multi-center analysis of 62.7M GNSS clock measurements revealing distance-structured correlations with exponential decay (λ = 3,330-4,549 km), consistent with screened scalar field predictions from the Temporal Equivalence Principle
RBH-1 reinterpreted as a gravitational soliton. Explains 650 km/s velocity with cold gas via metric shock, not thermal. Calibrated from GNSS data. Paper 8 of the TEP series.
Universal Critical Density: Unifying atomic, galactic, and compact object scales via gravitational solitons. Derives ρ_c ≈ 20 g/cm³ from GNSS clocks, validates across SPARC galaxies, magnetars, and Milky Way. TEP Paper 7.
Reinterprets dark matter observations as phantom mass from temporal shear in gravitational lensing. Conformal metric coupling creates temporal composite images, generating gravitational shear signatures. Resolves strong lensing time delays and core-cusp problem. TEP Paper 4.
Independent optical test of the Temporal Equivalence Principle using 11 years of LAGEOS satellite laser ranging data, revealing distance-structured correlations and spectral signatures consistent with conformal scalar field coupling
Covariant reformulation of relativity with dynamic time as a field and emergent light speed. Proposes two-metric geometry (gravitational + causal), synchronization holonomy as key observable, and falsifiable experimental tests. Addresses cosmological tensions while preserving local Lorentz invariance.
What Do Precision Tests of General Relativity Actually Measure? A methodological taxonomy showing why most precision tests constrain largely local, reciprocity-even observables within assumed frameworks. Proposes discriminating experiments. TEP Paper 10.