Open
Conversation
8519a0f to
373145b
Compare
Contributor
Author
|
@timoisik Could you have a look at it? We need it for our project (we use a JSON version polluted by this |
373145b to
fa4c605
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
It can be useful to specify that an extension has no content at all, for instance when parsing a HTML node containing multiple tags (I added an example for a
<blockquote>containing a<cite>tag).In JS, it can be done by not using the
contentkey:In this PR, I propose to add a
$noContentstatic property to Node to specify this behavior.When set to
true, thecontentkey is not added to the array.