Skip to content

Conversation

@nyurik
Copy link
Contributor

@nyurik nyurik commented Feb 3, 2026

No description provided.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 3, 2026

GNU testsuite comparison:

Skip an intermittent issue tests/tail/follow-name (fails in this run but passes in the 'main' branch)
Skipping an intermittent issue tests/shuf/shuf-reservoir (passes in this run but fails in the 'main' branch)
Skipping an intermittent issue tests/sort/sort-stale-thread-mem (passes in this run but fails in the 'main' branch)

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 4, 2026

GNU testsuite comparison:

Skipping an intermittent issue tests/tail/inotify-dir-recreate (passes in this run but fails in the 'main' branch)

@nyurik nyurik force-pushed the clippy branch 2 times, most recently from 7489d4f to adb143f Compare February 4, 2026 08:23
@codspeed-hq
Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Feb 4, 2026

Merging this PR will not alter performance

✅ 284 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 38 skipped benchmarks1


Comparing nyurik:clippy (76f5219) with main (d66dfe9)

Open in CodSpeed

Footnotes

  1. 38 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 4, 2026

GNU testsuite comparison:

Skipping an intermittent issue tests/tail/follow-name (passes in this run but fails in the 'main' branch)

@xtqqczze
Copy link
Contributor

xtqqczze commented Feb 4, 2026

@nyurik I've been fixing some clippy lints, I usually stick to 1 lint per PR for ease of review

@nyurik
Copy link
Contributor Author

nyurik commented Feb 4, 2026

@xtqqczze thx, makes sense. I moved a big number formatting change into #10717 making this PR only 50 line changes - hopefully makes it much easier to review

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 4, 2026

GNU testsuite comparison:

Skip an intermittent issue tests/shuf/shuf-reservoir (fails in this run but passes in the 'main' branch)
Skip an intermittent issue tests/sort/sort-stale-thread-mem (fails in this run but passes in the 'main' branch)

}
}

#[expect(clippy::unnested_or_patterns)]
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

please document "why"

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'll add a comment - but the extended version: this is what it would look like after optimization -- i don't think it's as readable

        [b'l' | b'r' | b'e', b'c']
            | [b'r', b's']
            | [b'n' | b's' | b'd', b'o']
            | [b'f' | b'd' | b'p' | b'm', b'i']
            | [b'l', b'n']
            | [b'b' | b'c', b'd']
            | [b'o', b'r' | b'w']
            | [b'e', b'x']
            | [b's', b'u' | b'g' | b't']
            | [b't', b'w']
            | [b'c', b'a' | b'l']
            | [b'm', b'h']

let mut formatted_possible_values = String::new();
for (i, s) in possible_values.iter().enumerate() {
formatted_possible_values.push_str(&format!("'{}'", s.get_name()));
let _ = write!(formatted_possible_values, "'{}'", s.get_name());
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

seems unrelated?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants