-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 130
feat[gpu]: CUDA date_time_parts kernel
#6303
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: develop
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Merging this PR will not alter performance
Comparing Footnotes
|
date_time_parts kernel
Signed-off-by: Alexander Droste <alexander.droste@protonmail.com>
| return Ok(Canonical::Extension( | ||
| TemporalArray::new_timestamp( | ||
| PrimitiveArray::empty::<i64>(validity.nullability()).into_array(), | ||
| time_unit, | ||
| time_zone, | ||
| ) | ||
| .into(), | ||
| )); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
can we not do Canonical::empty at the top?
| vortex_bail!("DateTimePartsArray dtype must be an Extension type") | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| let Some(options) = ext.metadata_opt::<Timestamp>() else { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
are timestamps always i64?
joseph-isaacs
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
a few qs
No description provided.