Skip to content

Conversation

@0ax1
Copy link
Contributor

@0ax1 0ax1 commented Feb 4, 2026

No description provided.

@0ax1 0ax1 changed the title feat[gpu]: cuda datetimeparts feat[gpu]: CUDA date_time_parts kernel Feb 4, 2026
@0ax1 0ax1 added the changelog/feature A new feature label Feb 4, 2026
@codspeed-hq
Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Feb 4, 2026

Merging this PR will not alter performance

✅ 1138 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 1265 skipped benchmarks1


Comparing ad/cuda-dtp (e74c57f) with develop (5886c27)

Open in CodSpeed

Footnotes

  1. 1265 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports.

@0ax1 0ax1 changed the title feat[gpu]: CUDA date_time_parts kernel feat[gpu]: CUDA date_time_parts kernel Feb 4, 2026
Signed-off-by: Alexander Droste <alexander.droste@protonmail.com>
@0ax1 0ax1 enabled auto-merge (squash) February 4, 2026 16:57
@0ax1 0ax1 requested review from a10y and joseph-isaacs February 4, 2026 16:57
Comment on lines +80 to +87
return Ok(Canonical::Extension(
TemporalArray::new_timestamp(
PrimitiveArray::empty::<i64>(validity.nullability()).into_array(),
time_unit,
time_zone,
)
.into(),
));
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can we not do Canonical::empty at the top?

vortex_bail!("DateTimePartsArray dtype must be an Extension type")
};

let Some(options) = ext.metadata_opt::<Timestamp>() else {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

are timestamps always i64?

Copy link
Contributor

@joseph-isaacs joseph-isaacs left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

a few qs

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

changelog/feature A new feature

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants