[Claude Generated] Add comprehensive features documentation

[lazysegtree]

Summary

This PR adds comprehensive feature documentation to the Superfile website and README.

Changes

• ✨ Added features-list.mdx to website documentation with:
  • Complete feature matrix covering all 45+ features
  • Platform-specific details for Linux, macOS, and Windows
  • External dependencies clearly documented
  • Organized into logical categories (navigation, operations, preview, etc.)
• 📝 Updated astro.config.mjs to include features list in sidebar navigation
• 📚 Added Features section to README with:
  • Brief feature highlights
  • Link to full documentation

Verification

All features were verified against the actual codebase to ensure accuracy:

• Confirmed shell usage (/bin/sh on Unix, powershell.exe on Windows)
• Verified metadata limitations on Windows/macOS (no owner/group info)
• Removed non-existent features from previous documentation attempts
• Added missing features like copy pwd, SPF prompt, etc.

Documentation Link

The features list will be available at: https://superfile.dev/list/features-list/

Notes

• No code changes, documentation only
• Features are based on current main branch implementation
• External dependencies are clearly marked with requirements

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Added a new Features section to the README highlighting key capabilities including multi-panel view, file preview, Vim-style navigation, clipboard operations, and more
  • Launched comprehensive Features list documentation detailing core features, file operations, customization options, and platform-specific support requirements
  • Added Features navigation link to the website sidebar for improved discoverability

_{✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.}

[github-actions]

⚠️ PR title format invalid.

superfile uses Conventional Commits for squash merges.

Allowed types:

feat, fix, refactor, chore, docs, test, style, perf, ci, build

👉 While not required, it’s recommended to include a scope like:

feat(file-preview): support Kitty image protocol
fix(renderer): correct ANSI fallback

---

No release type found in pull request title "[Claude Generated] Add comprehensive features documentation". Add a prefix to indicate what kind of release this pull request corresponds to. For reference, see https://www.conventionalcommits.org/

Available types:
 - feat
 - fix
 - refactor
 - chore
 - docs
 - test
 - style
 - perf
 - ci
 - build

[coderabbitai]

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Documentation enhancements introduce a comprehensive Features section to the README with detailed descriptions and links, extend the website navigation configuration to include the new features list, and add a dedicated features documentation page covering core features, platform support, dependencies, and configuration across multiple operating systems.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
README documentation README.md	Added Features section with feature list (multi-panel view, file preview, Vim-style navigation, etc.) and updated table of contents with Features link.
Website navigation website/astro.config.mjs	Added Features list entry to sidebar navigation with label "Features list" and route /list/features-list/.
Features documentation page website/src/content/docs/list/features-list.mdx	New comprehensive features documentation page covering Core Features, File Navigation, File Operations, Preview, Archives, Panel Management, Customization, Platform Support (Linux/macOS/Windows tabs), External Dependencies, Configuration, and Terminal Requirements using structured MDX components.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

Suggested labels

documentation

Suggested reviewers

• yorukot

Poem

🐰 New features listed with care,
Documentation blooms everywhere!
From README to sidebar bright,
Platform tabs shine left and right—
A comprehensive guide takes flight! ✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title directly relates to the PR's main objective of adding comprehensive feature documentation to the project website and README.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✨ Finishing touches

• 📝 Generate docstrings

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment
• Commit unit tests in branch add-features-documentation

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 83dd77f and 8dba115.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)

• README.md
• website/astro.config.mjs
• website/src/content/docs/list/features-list.mdx

🧰 Additional context used

🧠 Learnings (3)

📓 Common learnings

Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-04-12T12:00:32.688Z
Learning: In PR #767 for yorukot/superfile, the focus is on moving code (especially sidebar-related functionality) to a more organized structure without changing functionality. Pre-existing issues should be ignored since the purpose is code reorganization, not fixing existing problems.

Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 1013
File: src/internal/utils/file_utils.go:252-275
Timestamp: 2025-08-24T03:25:10.117Z
Learning: In PR #1013 for yorukot/superfile, when reviewing the ReadFileContent utility function, lazysegtree chose to implement only the parameter renaming fix (filepath → filePath) to avoid shadowing and declined buffer size increases and optional truncation enhancements, preferring to keep the utility function scope focused and avoid over-engineering when the additional features aren't immediately needed.

Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 963
File: src/internal/default_config.go:16-16
Timestamp: 2025-07-27T07:40:51.938Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers simpler implementation approaches when the alternatives are significantly more complex, even if the alternatives might be architecturally cleaner, prioritizing maintainability and avoiding over-engineering.

Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 963
File: src/internal/default_config.go:16-16
Timestamp: 2025-07-27T07:40:51.938Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers simpler implementation approaches when the alternatives are significantly more complex, even if the alternatives might be architecturally cleaner, prioritizing maintainability and avoiding over-engineering.

Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 969
File: src/internal/key_function.go:40-40
Timestamp: 2025-08-03T09:34:55.721Z
Learning: lazysegtree emphasizes proper dependency direction in software architecture, preferring that low-level components (like modal handlers) should not depend on high-level components (like the main model object). He also prioritizes performance considerations, noting that creating objects on every keypress in hot code paths like key handling is inefficient and should be avoided.

Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 1013
File: src/internal/model_render.go:329-341
Timestamp: 2025-08-29T14:11:21.380Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers to defer help menu rendering optimizations and other technical debt improvements to separate GitHub issues when the current PR scope has grown too large, maintaining focus on the primary refactoring objectives while tracking performance improvements for future work.

Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 985
File: src/internal/model.go:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-08-11T01:49:30.040Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers maintaining code correctness through proper design and invariants rather than adding defensive bounds checks at every slice access point, viewing such defensive programming as "duct taping" that can mask actual bugs instead of fixing them at their source.

Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 973
File: src/internal/ui/processbar/model_update.go:7-27
Timestamp: 2025-08-03T14:49:31.221Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers to keep test-only code simple without adding production-level concerns like goroutine synchronization, cancellation contexts, or complex lifecycle management, even when such patterns might prevent potential issues, since the complexity isn't justified for test utilities.

Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 1044
File: src/internal/utils/file_utils.go:149-149
Timestamp: 2025-09-09T13:29:11.771Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers to keep PR scope focused on the primary objectives and considers pre-existing technical debt issues as out of scope for migration/refactoring PRs, preferring to defer such issues to separate GitHub issues rather than expanding the current PR scope.

Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 950
File: src/internal/ui/metadata/README.md:7-7
Timestamp: 2025-07-24T03:46:29.516Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers to defer comprehensive unit testing to separate PRs when the current PR has grown too large, maintaining focus on the primary refactoring objectives while tracking testing requirements in dedicated GitHub issues.

Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 967
File: src/internal/key_function.go:45-47
Timestamp: 2025-08-02T11:47:07.713Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers to track technical debt and architectural improvements in dedicated GitHub issues when they are identified during PR reviews but are beyond the scope of the current PR, particularly for complex refactoring needs like input handling architecture that would require significant changes.

Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 963
File: src/internal/handle_file_operations.go:567-570
Timestamp: 2025-07-27T08:49:09.687Z
Learning: lazysegtree prefers to defer technical debt issues like model mutation concerns to later PRs when the current PR has already grown too large, maintaining focus on the primary objectives while acknowledging the need to track such issues for future work.

📚 Learning: 2025-04-12T12:25:06.352Z

Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-04-12T12:25:06.352Z
Learning: PR #770 "Sidebar code separation" is a refactoring and code reorganization effort with no new features. It involves moving code, updating import paths, renaming functions to follow PascalCase convention, and consolidating sidebar-related functionality into a dedicated package.

Applied to files:

• website/astro.config.mjs
• README.md

📚 Learning: 2025-07-15T10:32:28.063Z

Learnt from: lazysegtree
Repo: yorukot/superfile PR: 935
File: website/src/content/docs/changelog.md:17-26
Timestamp: 2025-07-15T10:32:28.063Z
Learning: In the superfile changelog (website/src/content/docs/changelog.md), lazysegtree prefers to maintain the existing heading format with main version headings using # and sub-sections using #### (Update, Bug fix, Optimization, etc.) consistently throughout all releases, prioritizing established format consistency over strict markdown heading hierarchy compliance.

Applied to files:

• README.md

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)

• GitHub Check: Cloudflare Pages

🔇 Additional comments (6)

website/astro.config.mjs (1)

167-170: LGTM! Clean sidebar addition.

The new Features list navigation item is properly structured and follows the existing pattern. The link correctly points to the new documentation page.

README.md (1)

96-109: Excellent Features section!

The new Features section provides a concise overview that accurately represents Superfile's capabilities. The feature highlights are consistent with the detailed documentation, and the link to the full features list provides a good path for users seeking more information.

website/src/content/docs/list/features-list.mdx (4)

1-11: Well-structured documentation setup.

The frontmatter and component imports are properly configured. Using standard Starlight components (Tabs, TabItem, Card, CardGrid) ensures consistent styling and functionality across the documentation site.

---

12-72: Comprehensive and well-organized feature documentation.

The Core Features section provides clear, categorized documentation of Superfile's capabilities. The tables are well-structured, and external dependencies are appropriately noted. The organization by functional area (Navigation, Operations, Preview, etc.) makes it easy for users to find relevant features.

---

73-95: Excellent use of tabs for platform-specific information.

The Platform Support section effectively uses the Tabs component to present OS-specific details. The information about metadata support, trash integration, and shell usage is valuable for users on different platforms.

---

97-134: Clear documentation of dependencies and requirements.

The External Dependencies section makes excellent use of the CardGrid component to visually present optional dependencies. The Feature Configuration and Terminal Requirements sections provide helpful reference information, and the internal link to the configuration guide is correct.

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[cloudflare-workers-and-pages]

Deploying superfile with    Cloudflare Pages

Latest commit:	8dba115
Status:	✅  Deploy successful!
Preview URL:	https://060d218b.superfile.pages.dev
Branch Preview URL:	https://add-features-documentation.superfile.pages.dev

View logs

[lazysegtree]

Missing strange features like

• restoring cursor from directoryRecord

[lazysegtree]

A PR now merged. This should be added

• feat(metadata): add binary architecture detection for ELF, PE, and Mach-O #1328