Adds process_tags to live debugger payloads#3580
Conversation
Co-Authored-By: PROFeNoM <alexandre.choura@datadoghq.com>
|
Benchmarks [ tracer ]Benchmark execution time: 2026-01-20 12:41:12 Comparing candidate commit 58d8f00 in PR branch Found 0 performance improvements and 4 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 189 metrics, 1 unstable metrics. scenario:SamplingRuleMatchingBench/benchRegexMatching1
scenario:SamplingRuleMatchingBench/benchRegexMatching2
scenario:SamplingRuleMatchingBench/benchRegexMatching3
scenario:SamplingRuleMatchingBench/benchRegexMatching4
|
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #3580 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 61.92% 61.92%
=======================================
Files 140 140
Lines 13309 13309
Branches 1762 1762
=======================================
Hits 8241 8241
Misses 4278 4278
Partials 790 790 Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
923101a to
3ce0af9
Compare
793e2b6 to
58d8f00
Compare
bwoebi
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks good, don't forget to update libdatadog to main before merging.
This PR implements this RFC for dynamic instrumentation.
Add process_tags to dynamic instrumentation payload.
This PR comes with this libdatadog PR: DataDog/libdatadog#1452 which justifies the temporary bump of libdatadog (to show that it works)