adding uptime-checks-workload.v1.json #699
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,37 @@ | ||
| { | ||
| "displayName": "${CLUSTER_NAME}/${WORKLOAD_NAME} GKE Load Balancer Check uptime failure" | ||
| "documentation": {}, | ||
| "userLabels": { | ||
| "workload_name": "${WORKLOAD_NAME}", | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment. If we want to match all the environment variables set from the Workload Details Observability tab workload_type = gke_deployment
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. not sure if i'm missing something, where are these user labels getting populated in the workload details tab? |
||
| "cluster": "${CLUSTER_NAME}", | ||
| "uptime_check_id": "${UPTIME_CHECK_ID}", | ||
| }, | ||
| "conditions": [ | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment. Missing conditions.displayName -> "Failure of ${alertPolicy.displayName}"
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. not sure how we'll populate the alert policy display name, i think it would make sense to put the uptime check name here? |
||
| { | ||
| "conditionThreshold": { | ||
| "aggregations": [ | ||
| { | ||
| "alignmentPeriod": "1200s", | ||
| "perSeriesAligner": "ALIGN_NEXT_OLDER", | ||
| "crossSeriesReducer": "REDUCE_COUNT_FALSE", | ||
| "groupByFields": [ | ||
| "resource.label.*" | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment. Our current alert policy lists these out, but if we want to support ingress + load balancer through the same policy template then I think this is fine |
||
| ], | ||
| } | ||
| ], | ||
| "comparison": "COMPARISON_GT", | ||
| "duration": "${UPTIME_DURATION}", | ||
| "filter": "metric.type=\"monitoring.googleapis.com/uptime_check/check_passed\" AND metric.label.check_id=\"${UPTIME_CHECK_ID}\" AND resource.type=\"k8s_service\"", | ||
nikitajainn-google marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||
| "thresholdValue": 1, | ||
| "trigger": { | ||
| "count": 1 | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| ], | ||
| "alertStrategy": { | ||
| "autoClose": "604800s" | ||
| }, | ||
| "combiner": "OR", | ||
| "enabled": true, | ||
nikitajainn-google marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||
| } | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this is fine for now but note we can technically support uptime checks for ingress via URL, so we may want to consider passing in the "Load Balancer" part of the display name