Skip to content

Wrap anonymous routines when they contain any sections#254

Closed
zaneduffield wants to merge 3 commits intointegrated-application-development:masterfrom
zaneduffield:no-inline-anon-proc-with-sections
Closed

Wrap anonymous routines when they contain any sections#254
zaneduffield wants to merge 3 commits intointegrated-application-development:masterfrom
zaneduffield:no-inline-anon-proc-with-sections

Conversation

@zaneduffield
Copy link
Collaborator

This is related to #241, but doesn't exactly address the issue there.

When thinking about that issue, I realised that it's probably a bad idea to try to format anonymous routines with sections inline in the first place. In making that change, I found and fixed a bug specifically with type sections in anonymous routines.

@zaneduffield zaneduffield requested a review from jgardn3r June 12, 2025 16:30
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 12, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!

@zaneduffield zaneduffield force-pushed the no-inline-anon-proc-with-sections branch from 66a2cd7 to db634d0 Compare June 12, 2025 16:36
Copy link
Collaborator

@jgardn3r jgardn3r left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Resolve your merge conflicts and update the wording and I think we are good to go.

@zaneduffield
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Superseded by #268.

@zaneduffield zaneduffield deleted the no-inline-anon-proc-with-sections branch August 24, 2025 23:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants