Potential fix for code scanning alert no. 10: Code injection#158
Open
juancarlosjr97 wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
Open
Potential fix for code scanning alert no. 10: Code injection#158juancarlosjr97 wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
juancarlosjr97 wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
Conversation
Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <62310815+github-advanced-security[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull Request Overview
This PR addresses a code-scanning alert by isolating untrusted input in an environment variable before use in the shell script, preventing potential code injection.
- Added
HEAD_BRANCHas an environment variable in therelease_optionsstep. - Replaced direct
${{ github.event.workflow_run.head_branch }}usage with the$HEAD_BRANCHvariable in the script.
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (1)
.github/workflows/release.yaml:20
- Consider adding
set -euo pipefailat the start of the script to ensure the step fails on errors or unset variables.
run: |
| steps: | ||
| - id: release_options | ||
| name: Release options | ||
| env: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
[nitpick] Add a brief comment above this line explaining that assigning to HEAD_BRANCH prevents shell injection by treating the input as a literal.
Suggested change
| env: | |
| env: | |
| # Assigning to HEAD_BRANCH prevents shell injection by treating the input as a literal. |
Comment on lines
+23
to
25
| branch="$HEAD_BRANCH" | ||
|
|
||
| if [ -n "$branch" ] && [ "$branch" = "develop" ]; then |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
[nitpick] You can simplify this step by using $HEAD_BRANCH directly in the conditional checks and remove the extra branch variable to reduce redundancy.
Suggested change
| branch="$HEAD_BRANCH" | |
| if [ -n "$branch" ] && [ "$branch" = "develop" ]; then | |
| if [ -n "$HEAD_BRANCH" ] && [ "$HEAD_BRANCH" = "develop" ]; then |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Potential fix for https://github.com/juancarlosjr97/release-it-containerized/security/code-scanning/10
To fix the issue, we will follow the recommended best practice of assigning the untrusted input to an intermediate environment variable and then referencing it using the native shell syntax. This approach ensures that the input is treated as a literal string and not executed as part of a shell command. Specifically:
HEAD_BRANCH) in theenvsection of the step, assigning it the value of${{ github.event.workflow_run.head_branch }}.$HEAD_BRANCHinstead of${{ github.event.workflow_run.head_branch }}.This change will ensure that the input is properly sanitized and prevent potential code injection.
Suggested fixes powered by Copilot Autofix. Review carefully before merging.