chore(guard): centralize cors config#4097
chore(guard): centralize cors config#4097MasterPtato wants to merge 1 commit into02-02-fix_api_use_matched_path_to_reduce_metric_cardinalityfrom
Conversation
|
🚅 Deployed to the rivet-pr-4097 environment in rivet-frontend
|
Code Review - PR #4097: chore(guard): centralize cors configSummaryThis PR centralizes CORS configuration by moving CORS header logic from Positive Aspects ✅
Issues & Recommendations1. Potential Header Injection Vulnerability 🔴 CriticalLocation: The code uses Recommendation:
2. Inconsistent Error Handling PatternLocation: The new code uses the Recommendation: Consider using 3. Type Safety Issue - TODO Not AddressedLocation: The TODO comment indicates 4. Missing DocumentationLocation: The 5. Code Style - Comment FormattingLocation: Per CLAUDE.md guidelines, comments should be complete sentences. The current comments are fragments ("Only set for OPTIONS requests", "Seconds"). Recommendation: Use complete sentences like "These fields are only set for OPTIONS requests." 6. Unnecessary CommentsLocation: The comments explaining when optional fields should be Testing ConsiderationsThe PR description does not mention testing. Consider:
Performance ConsiderationsNo significant performance concerns. The changes are purely organizational. Security Assessment✅ Good: Vary header prevents cache poisoning ConclusionThis is a solid refactoring that improves code organization. However, it has one critical security concern around header injection that should be addressed before merging. The other issues are lower priority but would improve code quality. Recommendation: Request changes to address the header injection vulnerability, then approve after fixes. |
bdba6ac to
89f49de
Compare
efea839 to
bf38fdd
Compare
bf38fdd to
1e902d5
Compare
1e902d5 to
cb28ad8
Compare
cb28ad8 to
d3bae78
Compare
89f49de to
7b579e8
Compare
Merge activity
|
# Description Please include a summary of the changes and the related issue. Please also include relevant motivation and context. ## Type of change - [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) - [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected) - [ ] This change requires a documentation update ## How Has This Been Tested? Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. ## Checklist: - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes

Description
Please include a summary of the changes and the related issue. Please also include relevant motivation and context.
Type of change
How Has This Been Tested?
Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes.
Checklist: