-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 151
fix(gas): fix history location assignment for optional execs #4102
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix(gas): fix history location assignment for optional execs #4102
Conversation
07288c0 to
1728003
Compare
cc9ebec to
813aa32
Compare
813aa32 to
2818a7d
Compare
1728003 to
349575f
Compare
|
🚅 Deployed to the rivet-pr-4102 environment in rivet-frontend
|
Merge activity
|
# Description Please include a summary of the changes and the related issue. Please also include relevant motivation and context. ## Type of change - [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) - [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected) - [ ] This change requires a documentation update ## How Has This Been Tested? Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. ## Checklist: - [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
Code Review: PR #4102 - Fix history location assignment for optional execsSummaryThis PR fixes a bug in the Gasoline workflow engine where Changes Reviewed1. engine/packages/gasoline/src/executable.rs (Primary Fix)Change: Modified Analysis:
2. engine/packages/engine/src/util/wf/mod.rs (Display Fix)Change: Added indentation before printing version check information (line 497). Analysis:
Code Quality AssessmentStrengths:
Areas for Improvement:
Security Considerations✅ No security concerns identified Performance Considerations✅ No performance impact Breaking Changes
Recommendations
VerdictConditional Approval: The code changes are correct and fix a real bug, but the PR needs:
The fix itself is sound and follows best practices. |

Description
Please include a summary of the changes and the related issue. Please also include relevant motivation and context.
Type of change
How Has This Been Tested?
Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes.
Checklist: