-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
compliance_dashboard
makr-code edited this page Dec 22, 2025
·
2 revisions
Version: 1.1
Stand: Dezember 2025
Typ: Executive Summary & Status-Übersicht
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ ThemisDB Compliance Score │
│ │
│ ██████████████████████████████████████░░░░░░░░░░ 85% │
│ │
│ ✅ Bestanden: 17 von 20 Kategorien │
│ ⚠️ In Arbeit: 3 Kategorien │
│ ❌ Kritisch: 0 Kategorien │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
| Standard | Version | Erfüllung | Status | Nachweis |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BSI C5 | 2020 | 85% | ✅ | FULL_AUDIT_CHECKLIST.md |
| ISO 27001 | 2022 | 80% | ✅ | FULL_AUDIT_CHECKLIST.md |
| ISO 27017 | 2015 | 75% | Cloud-spezifisch | |
| ISO 27018 | 2019 | 80% | ✅ | PII-Schutz |
| ISO 27701 | 2019 | 70% | DPIA.md |
|
| ISO 22301 | 2019 | 75% | BCP_DRP.md |
|
| DSGVO | 2016/679 | 90% | ✅ | DPIA.md |
| eIDAS | 910/2014 | 95% | ✅ | PKI implementiert |
| NIS2 | 2022/2555 | 70% | Teilweise | |
| SOC 2 | Type II | 85% | ✅ | Trust Criteria |
| HIPAA | - | 80% | ✅ | Falls anwendbar |
| PCI DSS | v4.0 | 80% | ✅ | Falls anwendbar |
| TISAX | AL2/3 | 75% | Automotive | |
| NIST CSF | 2.0 | 75% | FULL_AUDIT_CHECKLIST.md |
|
| Common Criteria | ISO 15408 | EAL2+ | ✅ | Evaluiert |
| KRITIS | BSI-KritisV | 75% | Falls anwendbar | |
| DIN EN ISO 9001 | 2015 | 80% | ✅ | Qualitätsmanagement |
| # | Dokument | Pfad | Seiten | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Audit-Checkliste | docs/compliance/compliance_full_checklist.md |
885 Zeilen | ✅ |
| 2 | Security Audit Report | docs/reports/SECURITY_AUDIT_REPORT.md |
350 Zeilen | ✅ |
| 3 | Security Policy | SECURITY.md |
150 Zeilen | ✅ |
| 4 | Incident Response Plan | docs/security/security_incident_response.md |
500 Zeilen | ✅ |
| 5 | SBOM Dokumentation | docs/security/security_sbom.md |
200 Zeilen | ✅ |
| 6 | Malware Scanner | docs/security/security_malware_scanner.md |
350 Zeilen | ✅ |
| 7 | DPIA | docs/compliance/compliance_dpia.md |
400 Zeilen | ✅ |
| 8 | BCP/DRP | docs/compliance/compliance_bcp_drp.md |
500 Zeilen | ✅ |
| 9 | Risk Register | docs/compliance/compliance_risk_register.md |
350 Zeilen | ✅ |
| 10 | Vendor Assessment | docs/compliance/compliance_vendor_assessment.md |
350 Zeilen | ✅ |
| 11 | Access Control Policy | docs/policies/policies_access_control.md |
400 Zeilen | ✅ |
| 12 | Change Management Policy | docs/policies/policies_change_management.md |
450 Zeilen | ✅ |
| 13 | Data Classification Policy | docs/policies/policies_data_classification.md |
500 Zeilen | ✅ |
| 14 | Encryption & Key Management | docs/policies/policies_encryption_key.md |
750 Zeilen | ✅ |
| 15 | Project Valuation | 🔒 Confidential | N/A | 🔒 |
| # | Datei | Pfad | Beschreibung |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AFL++ Config (JSON) | fuzz/aflplusplus-config.json |
Fuzzing-Konfiguration |
| 2 | AFL++ Config (YAML) | fuzz/aflplusplus-config.yaml |
Fuzzing-Konfiguration |
| 3 | Fuzzing Workflow | .github/workflows/fuzzing.yml |
CI/CD Integration |
| 4 | Dictionaries | fuzz/dictionaries/*.dict |
AQL, JSON, Crypto |
| 5 | Harnesses | fuzz/harnesses/*.cpp |
Parser Harnesses |
| Workflow | Pfad | Frequenz | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| SBOM Generation | .github/workflows/sbom.yml |
Bei Release | ✅ |
| Security Scanning | .github/workflows/security-scan.yml |
Wöchentlich + PR | ✅ |
| AFL++ Fuzzing | .github/workflows/fuzzing.yml |
Wöchentlich | ✅ |
| Kategorie | Score | Details |
|---|---|---|
| Gesamt | 85/100 | Bestanden |
| Secret Management | 100% | Keine Hardcoded Secrets |
| Cryptography | 100% | Nur starke Algorithmen |
| Access Control | 95% | RBAC implementiert |
| Audit Logging | 95% | 65+ Event-Typen |
| Input Validation | 90% | Umfassend |
| Memory Safety | 85% | Sanitizer verfügbar |
| Dependencies | 75% | SBOM + Monitoring |
| Schweregrad | Anzahl | Status |
|---|---|---|
| 🔴 Kritisch | 0 | ✅ |
| 🟠 Hoch | 0 | ✅ |
| 🟡 Mittel | 3 | |
| 🟢 Niedrig | 5 |
| Metrik | Wert |
|---|---|
| Lines of Code | 90,829 (16 Source-Module) |
| Header-Dateien | 132 |
| Source-Dateien | 124 |
| Sprachen | C++, C#, Python, TypeScript, Go, Rust, Java |
| Test Coverage | 85%+ |
| Unit Tests | 143+ |
| Dokumentation | 456+ Dateien |
| Kategorie | Wert |
|---|---|
| Entwicklungsaufwand | 160 Personenmonate |
| Entwicklungskosten | 4.5 - 7.5 Mio € |
| IP-Wert | 8.5 - 15 Mio € |
| SaaS-Potenzial (10x ARR) | ~27 Mio € |
| Kategorie | Maßnahme | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Verschlüsselung | AES-256-GCM (at-rest) | ✅ |
| Transport | TLS 1.3, mTLS | ✅ |
| Authentifizierung | Token, mTLS, RBAC | ✅ |
| Autorisierung | 4-stufiges RBAC | ✅ |
| Audit | 65+ Event-Typen, Encrypt-then-Sign | ✅ |
| Key Management | Vault/HSM, Rotation | ✅ |
| PII-Schutz | Detection, Encryption | ✅ |
| Backup | Checkpoints, WAL, PITR | ✅ |
| Monitoring | Prometheus, Alerting | ✅ |
| Rate Limiting | Token Bucket | ✅ |
| Kategorie | Maßnahme | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Security Policy | SECURITY.md | ✅ |
| Incident Response | IRP dokumentiert | ✅ |
| Business Continuity | BCP/DRP | ✅ |
| Datenschutz | DPIA durchgeführt | ✅ |
| Vulnerability Disclosure | GitHub Security Advisories | ✅ |
| SBOM | Automatisiert | ✅ |
| SAST | CI/CD integriert | ✅ |
| # | Befund | Empfehlung | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| - | Keine kritischen Punkte | - | ✅ |
| # | Befund | Empfehlung | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Penetrationstest | Externes Testing beauftragen | |
| 2 | Fuzzing | AFL++/libFuzzer implementieren |
| # | Befund | Empfehlung | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | DR-Tests | Regelmäßige Übungen planen | |
| 4 | SIEM-Integration | Log-Aggregation | |
| 5 | DLP | Data Loss Prevention | 📋 Geplant |
- Audit-Checkliste (20+ Standards)
- Security Audit durchführen
- SECURITY.md erstellen
- Incident Response Plan
- SBOM-Generierung
- SAST CI/CD
- DPIA
- BCP/DRP
- Penetrationstest beauftragen
- Fuzzing implementieren
- DR-Tests durchführen
- ISO 27001 Audit vorbereiten
- ISO 27001 Zertifizierung
- SOC 2 Type II Attestierung
- TISAX Assessment (falls Automotive)
- Bug Bounty Programm
| Anforderung | Nachweis | Verfügbar |
|---|---|---|
| Sicherheitspolitik | SECURITY.md | ✅ |
| Risikoanalyse | DPIA.md, Threat Model | ✅ |
| TOMs | Dokumentation, Code | ✅ |
| Incident Management | IRP | ✅ |
| Business Continuity | BCP/DRP | ✅ |
| Logging & Monitoring | Prometheus, Audit-Logs | ✅ |
| Zugriffskontrolle | RBAC-Dokumentation | ✅ |
| Verschlüsselung | Encryption Strategy | ✅ |
| Penetrationstest | Bericht | |
| SBOM | SPDX, CycloneDX | ✅ |
| Rolle | Kontakt |
|---|---|
| Audit Lead | [Name eintragen] |
| Security Lead | [Name eintragen] |
| Datenschutz | [Name eintragen] |
| IT-Operations | [Name eintragen] |
| KPI | Ziel | Aktuell | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|
| Security Score | > 80% | 85% | ✅ |
| Kritische Vulnerabilities | 0 | 0 | ✅ |
| MTTD (Mean Time to Detect) | < 1h | TBD | - |
| MTTR (Mean Time to Respond) | < 4h | TBD | - |
| Test Coverage | > 80% | 85% | ✅ |
| Backup Success Rate | 100% | TBD | - |
| KPI | Ziel | Aktuell | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standards Compliance | > 80% | 85% | ✅ |
| Dokumentation Vollständigkeit | 100% | 95% | ✅ |
| Audit-Findings behoben | 100% | 90% | |
| Policy-Verstöße | 0 | 0 | ✅ |
| Ressource | Link |
|---|---|
| Audit-Checkliste | FULL_AUDIT_CHECKLIST.md |
| Security Report | SECURITY_AUDIT_REPORT.md |
| Security Policy | SECURITY.md |
| Incident Response | INCIDENT_RESPONSE_PLAN.md |
| DPIA | DPIA.md |
| BCP/DRP | BCP_DRP.md |
| Projektwert | THEMIS_PROJECT_VALUATION.md |
| SBOM | SBOM.md |
Letzte Aktualisierung: Dezember 2025
Dokumentverantwortlicher: ThemisDB Compliance Team
Nächstes Review: [Datum + 3 Monate]
ThemisDB v1.3.4 | GitHub | Documentation | Discussions | License
Last synced: January 02, 2026 | Commit: 6add659
Version: 1.3.0 | Stand: Dezember 2025
- Übersicht
- Home
- Dokumentations-Index
- Quick Reference
- Sachstandsbericht 2025
- Features
- Roadmap
- Ecosystem Overview
- Strategische Übersicht
- Geo/Relational Storage
- RocksDB Storage
- MVCC Design
- Transaktionen
- Time-Series
- Memory Tuning
- Chain of Thought Storage
- Query Engine & AQL
- AQL Syntax
- Explain & Profile
- Rekursive Pfadabfragen
- Temporale Graphen
- Zeitbereichs-Abfragen
- Semantischer Cache
- Hybrid Queries (Phase 1.5)
- AQL Hybrid Queries
- Hybrid Queries README
- Hybrid Query Benchmarks
- Subquery Quick Reference
- Subquery Implementation
- Content Pipeline
- Architektur-Details
- Ingestion
- JSON Ingestion Spec
- Enterprise Ingestion Interface
- Geo-Processor Design
- Image-Processor Design
- Hybrid Search Design
- Fulltext API
- Hybrid Fusion API
- Stemming
- Performance Tuning
- Migration Guide
- Future Work
- Pagination Benchmarks
- Enterprise README
- Scalability Features
- HTTP Client Pool
- Build Guide
- Implementation Status
- Final Report
- Integration Analysis
- Enterprise Strategy
- Verschlüsselungsstrategie
- Verschlüsselungsdeployment
- Spaltenverschlüsselung
- Encryption Next Steps
- Multi-Party Encryption
- Key Rotation Strategy
- Security Encryption Gap Analysis
- Audit Logging
- Audit & Retention
- Compliance Audit
- Compliance
- Extended Compliance Features
- Governance-Strategie
- Compliance-Integration
- Governance Usage
- Security/Compliance Review
- Threat Model
- Security Hardening Guide
- Security Audit Checklist
- Security Audit Report
- Security Implementation
- Development README
- Code Quality Pipeline
- Developers Guide
- Cost Models
- Todo Liste
- Tool Todo
- Core Feature Todo
- Priorities
- Implementation Status
- Roadmap
- Future Work
- Next Steps Analysis
- AQL LET Implementation
- Development Audit
- Sprint Summary (2025-11-17)
- WAL Archiving
- Search Gap Analysis
- Source Documentation Plan
- Changefeed README
- Changefeed CMake Patch
- Changefeed OpenAPI
- Changefeed OpenAPI Auth
- Changefeed SSE Examples
- Changefeed Test Harness
- Changefeed Tests
- Dokumentations-Inventar
- Documentation Summary
- Documentation TODO
- Documentation Gap Analysis
- Documentation Consolidation
- Documentation Final Status
- Documentation Phase 3
- Documentation Cleanup Validation
- API
- Authentication
- Cache
- CDC
- Content
- Geo
- Governance
- Index
- LLM
- Query
- Security
- Server
- Storage
- Time Series
- Transaction
- Utils
Vollständige Dokumentation: https://makr-code.github.io/ThemisDB/